Question : Summarise the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage.

Essay topics:

Question : Summarise the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage.

The lecture and the reading are talking about carved stone balls.The lecture opposes the main idea of the reading and logically dispute all the specific points in the reading .According to the reading the sciences found more stone characteristics. However, the professor in his lecture refutes this argument and challenges all the reason in the reading.

First, the reading mention that the stone balls was used as an instrument for hunt and fight. The lecture present another point of view. Some stones indeed present areas of wearing,But the most of then not. They regullary are well preserved and show little or nothing of damage.

Secondly,the reading claims that the stone ball were use as a part of measures systems. Nevertheless the lectures state that. All the stones even when their size are similar.The difference is the mass and density. the stones are quartz, sand, and green.So, is almost impossible establish a pattern to scale.

Finally the reading says that the mining of the stones in the social status of the owners was evidence. The professor address the last point and refutes this claim starting with. The stone was extremely simple so that theory cannot by true. Do to the fact no evidence of stone were found on tombs or grut . As conclusion those do not remark the social status in the community.

Votes
Average: 6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-15 dentista1985 76 view
2020-01-13 jiyakavya 80 view
2020-01-12 dentista1985 60 view
2020-01-10 jiyakavya 3 view
2020-01-09 jiyakavya 3 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user dentista1985 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 67, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...ng are talking about carved stone balls.The lecture opposes the main idea of the re...
^^^
Line 1, column 168, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y dispute all the specific points in the reading .According to the reading the sc...
^^
Line 1, column 177, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... all the specific points in the reading .According to the reading the sciences fo...
^^
Line 1, column 179, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: According
...ll the specific points in the reading .According to the reading the sciences found more ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 181, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , But
...e stones indeed present areas of wearing,But the most of then not. They regullary ar...
^^^^
Line 5, column 9, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
... little or nothing of damage. Secondly,the reading claims that the stone ball were...
^^^^
Line 5, column 89, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Nevertheless,
...were use as a part of measures systems. Nevertheless the lectures state that. All the stones...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 175, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...stones even when their size are similar.The difference is the mass and density. the...
^^^
Line 5, column 215, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...The difference is the mass and density. the stones are quartz, sand, and green.So, ...
^^^
Line 5, column 254, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: So
... the stones are quartz, sand, and green.So, is almost impossible establish a patte...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...ossible establish a pattern to scale. Finally the reading says that the mining of the...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 232, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s extremely simple so that theory cannot by true. Do to the fact no evidence of s...
^^
Line 7, column 306, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...nce of stone were found on tombs or grut . As conclusion those do not remark the s...
^^
Line 7, column 309, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... of stone were found on tombs or grut . As conclusion those do not remark the soci...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, then, well, talking about

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 22.412803532 49% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 30.3222958057 69% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1104.0 1373.03311258 80% => OK
No of words: 222.0 270.72406181 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97297297297 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52361605995 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.585585585586 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 336.6 419.366225166 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.1027246204 49.2860985944 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.6 110.228320801 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.8 21.698381199 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.06452816374 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 14.0 4.19205298013 334% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.100817854713 0.272083759551 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.031896861373 0.0996497079465 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0442056030942 0.0662205650399 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0649494896674 0.162205337803 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0373759756339 0.0443174109184 84% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.3589403974 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 53.8541721854 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.95 12.2367328918 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 63.6247240618 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.