the reading passage and lecture argue about the pros and cons of teamwork vs Individual work
The article supports the teamwork, while the lecture opposes it.
First of all, the article states that, If the people were working as a team, they would have great knowledge and quick response to solve the problem than an individual's work. However, the lecture opposes this point by saying that everyone in the team didn't contribute much more. Furthermore, the lecture used a corporate company as an example to explain. According to the lecture, the company was initiated a group project and analyzed the results after six months. The outcome was surprising because most of the team members didn't contribute to the project.
Second, the passage posits that if the people were working as a group, they would easily take a crucial decision because the responsibility would spread to the whole group. The lecture, On the other hand, casts a doubt reading claim. He feels that the people in the group project will take too much time for a final decision. According to the professor, in every team have one or two influential workers, they dominate the rest of the team members. As a result, it consumes a lot of time to develop a final decision.
Lastly, The reading passage claims that the individuals in the group, who works hard, gets benefited and a great chance for freshers to update their knowledge. The professor makes an argument on this point by saying that the individuals won't get any recognition. Furthermore, the professor illustrated that in the teamwork recognization is always for the whole group and it's bad for the real contributors.
- If you were given some financial support to start a business, what business would you start? Use specific reasons and examples 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for students to understand ideas and concepts than it is for them to learn facts. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Some people believe, the best of learning about life is listening to the advice of their friends and families, while others believe it should be learn through personal experience. Which do you prefer and why? 70
- The widespread use of the internet has given people access to information on a level never experienced before. How does this increase in the availability of information influence life in today's world?" 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 93, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... were working as a team, they would have great knowledge and quick response to so...
^^
Line 2, column 252, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...int by saying that everyone in the team didnt contribute much more. Furthermore, the ...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 527, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...rising because most of the team members didnt contribute to the project. Second, the...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, lastly, second, so, while, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1292.0 1373.03311258 94% => OK
No of words: 261.0 270.72406181 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95019157088 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.673566403 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 145.348785872 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540229885057 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 396.9 419.366225166 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.9128969495 49.2860985944 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.2857142857 110.228320801 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6428571429 21.698381199 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.78571428571 7.06452816374 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156264541488 0.272083759551 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0514644098759 0.0996497079465 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0510349911418 0.0662205650399 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104412907019 0.162205337803 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0342482991549 0.0443174109184 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.3589403974 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.