The reading states that altruistic behavior is an integral part of people's and animals' lives. However, the lecturer suggests that we make a mistake when thinking that this behavior has no benefits.
The reading and the lecture discuss the topic regarding altruism, and examples which provide human beings and animals in their real lives. The author believes that altruistic behavior is an integral part of people and group of animals dwelling and prepare several valuable examples. However, the speaker suggests that we make a mistake when think that this behavior is with zero benefits and show us examples with another side.
First of all, the author claims that person and group of individuals are ready to share food and donate their body organs to another people for free. Moreover, the author appears that this behavior is unselfish act that belong to every member of society. The lecture rebuts this argument suggesting that donors do not receive any appreciation after organs donations because they do not recognize this fact.
Secondly, the article notes that many species of animals have altruistic behavior and provide us with example when one representative of meerkat can be a custodian for other meerkats when they hunt or have food. Nevertheless, this point is challenged by the lecturer, and she says that this mammal from the previous example has already eaten before, he has full stomach, and we cannot use this example.
The third aspect of the debate is the meerkat behavior. Does he guard other meerkats from predators or do something else? The article, on the one hand, establishes that the meerkat is a sentinel and caretaker when other animals try to eat food. The professor, on the other hand, posits that this meerkat has an excellent opportunity to save his life because he is on the edge and could see dangerous situation the first and go away and find a shelter.
- Do you prefer traditional style classes or pre recorded classes 87
- The graphs below show information about electronic games in South Korea in 2003 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It should be mandatory for all teenagers to take a world history class 90
- Do you think it is better to start learning a new language as an infant as a child or as a teenager Provide reasons and examples to support your stance 80
- Some people think that advertising plays a positive role whereas others refer to its negative impact Do you agree or disagree 90
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, regarding, second, secondly, so, third, well, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 7.30242825607 233% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1418.0 1373.03311258 103% => OK
No of words: 284.0 270.72406181 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99295774648 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48184241192 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566901408451 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 419.366225166 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0794246165 49.2860985944 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.166666667 110.228320801 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 21.698381199 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5 7.06452816374 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.322644282608 0.272083759551 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107521963641 0.0996497079465 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0853987014195 0.0662205650399 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193093506008 0.162205337803 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.132727853475 0.0443174109184 299% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.3589403974 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.