The reading states that reducing the working week to 4 day with 10 hours per day is benefitials for both employees and compalies. However the professor explain the author uses weak unconvincing theories for this change.
First, the author mentions that 4work week will reduce the expenses for emplyees. In response the professor explain that employes spend 30 mils to go to theirr work which cost 15-20 dollores and yearly is costs 850 dollar. As a result this cost doesn't justify this dramatic change.
Secondly, the reading sates that reducing the number of work by a day will lower the operating cost. However, professor opposes this and said that this theory is in fact misguided. The professor explains that businesses will loss 20% of their profits due to this change because two hours in the working schedule occurs late and all the potential would be gone by that time.
Third, the author explains that 4-day workweek will improve the ability of employees to spend time with their familiy. In contrast, the professor refutes this point by explaining that employees won't have more time with their family. The employees with littel children that work 10 hours per day have to find day care facility with extended working schedule which this would be a difficult and stressful task for them. Furthermore, the employees that have kids going to the school, they will not spend more time with their kids because they are in school in the first half of the day.
In conclusion the professor showed that author provided weak theories about the change in the working days.
First, the author mentions that 4work week will reduce the expenses for emplyees. In response the professor explain that employes spend 30 mils to go to theirr work which cost 15-20 dollores and yearly is costs 850 dollar. As a result this cost doesn't justify this dramatic change.
Secondly, the reading sates that reducing the number of work by a day will lower the operating cost. However, professor opposes this and said that this theory is in fact misguided. The professor explains that businesses will loss 20% of their profits due to this change because two hours in the working schedule occurs late and all the potential would be gone by that time.
Third, the author explains that 4-day workweek will improve the ability of employees to spend time with their familiy. In contrast, the professor refutes this point by explaining that employees won't have more time with their family. The employees with littel children that work 10 hours per day have to find day care facility with extended working schedule which this would be a difficult and stressful task for them. Furthermore, the employees that have kids going to the school, they will not spend more time with their kids because they are in school in the first half of the day.
In conclusion the professor showed that author provided weak theories about the change in the working days.
- The author states that 4 working days per week will be benefitials for both emplyees and businesses and the author provides three reasons for this In response the professor explains that reducing the workingweek by a day is benefities for employees and bu 80
- School Uniforms 65
- Earth is one of the most important place for living creatures incluing humans animals and plants A lot of human activity that has been done had a trendemous effect in it weather it was good or bad Some people believe that earth is being harmed by human ac 66
- The reading states that in the Pacific ocean have found the evidences that uncovers the theory of the decimation of the Easter islanders from invaders and provides three reasons of support In contrast the professor opposes each of the reasons he explains 63
- Some students prefer classes with open discussions between the professor and students and almost no lectures Other students prefer classes with lectures and almost no discussions Which do you prefer Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 216, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'dollar' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'dollars'.
Suggestion: dollars
... 15-20 dollores and yearly is costs 850 dollar. As a result this cost doesnt justify t...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 224, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ollores and yearly is costs 850 dollar. As a result this cost doesnt justify this ...
^^
Line 1, column 246, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...costs 850 dollar. As a result this cost doesnt justify this dramatic change. Second...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 152, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rofessor opposes this and said that this theory is in fact misguided. The profess...
^^
Line 5, column 431, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd stressful task for them. Furthermore, the employees that have kids going to th...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, third, in conclusion, in contrast, in fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1128.0 1373.03311258 82% => OK
No of words: 230.0 270.72406181 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90434782609 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.25884524759 2.5805825403 88% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552173913043 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 315.0 419.366225166 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0385498016 49.2860985944 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.545454545 110.228320801 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9090909091 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06452816374 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.410832480049 0.272083759551 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.156621761984 0.0996497079465 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0833825016332 0.0662205650399 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233200227384 0.162205337803 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.034440568424 0.0443174109184 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 53.8541721854 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 63.6247240618 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 216, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'dollar' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'dollars'.
Suggestion: dollars
... 15-20 dollores and yearly is costs 850 dollar. As a result this cost doesnt justify t...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 224, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ollores and yearly is costs 850 dollar. As a result this cost doesnt justify this ...
^^
Line 1, column 246, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...costs 850 dollar. As a result this cost doesnt justify this dramatic change. Second...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 152, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rofessor opposes this and said that this theory is in fact misguided. The profess...
^^
Line 5, column 431, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd stressful task for them. Furthermore, the employees that have kids going to th...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, third, in conclusion, in contrast, in fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1128.0 1373.03311258 82% => OK
No of words: 230.0 270.72406181 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90434782609 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.25884524759 2.5805825403 88% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552173913043 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 315.0 419.366225166 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0385498016 49.2860985944 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.545454545 110.228320801 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9090909091 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06452816374 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.410832480049 0.272083759551 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.156621761984 0.0996497079465 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0833825016332 0.0662205650399 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233200227384 0.162205337803 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.034440568424 0.0443174109184 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 53.8541721854 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 63.6247240618 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.