Rembrandt is the most famous artist...
The author of the reading passage and the lecturer both are about the painting known as Portrait of an Elderly Woman in a White Bonnet. The reading claims that the painting was not the original work of the Rembrandt whereas the lecturer suggests the painting was the derivative from the Rembrandt painting. The lecturer has supported the main points mentioned in the reading passage by giving some cogent reasons and explanations.
First, according to the passage, the painting was not drawn by the Rembrandt since there is inconsistent in the woman dress.In addition, the lecturer has supported this point by mentioning if Rembrandt had drawn the painting then he would never had done such an error. In fact, it is done to increase the value of the art.
Second, the reading passage claims that light and shadow in the painting do not fit together. Supporting this idea, lecturer says that in the original painting the shadow and the lighting has matched.But the one which is derivative from the original one does not have the matching light and shadow. Hence, lecturer feels the art is copy from the original art and thinks it is not drawn by the Rembrandt.
Finally, the reading states that the painting was painted on a panel made of several pieces of wood glued together. In support of this idea, the lecturer mentioned that the wood used were from the same tree that Rembrandt used to make panel. Nevertheless, Rembrandt had never used the several pieces of wood to make his panel. Therefore, the painting is not original art of Rembrandt.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-08-02 | nusybah | 73 | view |
2023-06-06 | YasamanEsml | 73 | view |
2023-06-06 | YasamanEsml | 70 | view |
2023-04-23 | Yam Kumar Oli | 70 | view |
2023-02-24 | Muggle | 80 | view |
- Professors' appearance on television. 73
- Rembrandt is a famous... 3
- Some people prefer to live in a small town. Others prefer to live in a big city. Which place would you prefer to live in? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 73
- It has been said Not everything that is learned is contained in books Compare and contrast knowledge gained from experience with knowledge gained from books In your opinion which source is more important Why 70
- It is important to keep old friends than it is to make new friends. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 308, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...derivative from the Rembrandt painting. The lecturer has supported the main points...
^^^
Line 1, column 334, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ndt painting. The lecturer has supported the main points mentioned in the reading...
^^
Line 3, column 125, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...here is inconsistent in the woman dress.In addition, the lecturer has supported th...
^^
Line 5, column 40, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Second, the reading passage claims that light and shadow in the painting do not ...
^^
Line 5, column 202, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: But
...the shadow and the lighting has matched.But the one which is derivative from the or...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, hence, if, nevertheless, second, so, then, therefore, whereas, in addition, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1291.0 1373.03311258 94% => OK
No of words: 264.0 270.72406181 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89015151515 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52009542851 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 145.348785872 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.435606060606 0.540411800872 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 385.2 419.366225166 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.9606153858 49.2860985944 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.583333333 110.228320801 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 21.698381199 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.06452816374 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0971741952026 0.272083759551 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0469548971804 0.0996497079465 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0495734085478 0.0662205650399 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0686440189624 0.162205337803 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0229289200467 0.0443174109184 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.3 8.42419426049 87% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 63.6247240618 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.