Rembrandt painting
The reading and the lecture are both about one of the Rembrandt paintings including the face of an elderly woman. The author of the reading suggests that although, the woman's face resembles to Rambrant's portraits, but there is 3 reason to present that it could not be the Rembrant's paintings. The lecturer challenges these claims. He is of the opinion that these assertion are correct.
First, the writer contends that there is something incampatible about the woman' dress. there is inconsistency between a linen cap that it is worn only by servants and fur collar that any servant could not pay for it, even though Renbrant would pay attention to details of his character's clothing.This argument is challenged by the lecturer. He says that according to analyst the fur collar was not part of the original painting and maybe it was added by another person several years after the time of painting by Rembrant.
Secondly, the author asserts that there is something wrong with light and shadow in this painting whereas Renbrandt was expert in painting of light and shadow. The lecturer, however, rebuts this argument by mentioning that the original portrait is very realistic so that the white cluff lighten the woman' face.
Finally, it is stated in the article that the panel of this portrait is made of several pieces of wood connected together with glue , but Rembrandt's painting were often on one piece of wood.The lecturer, on the other hand, posits that wood pieces is added to increase the size of the painting by others later as well as the fur collar.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-02 | nusybah | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-06 | YasamanEsml | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-06 | YasamanEsml | 70 | view |
| 2023-04-23 | Yam Kumar Oli | 70 | view |
| 2023-02-24 | Muggle | 80 | view |
- universities should give credit to sports and social activities as well as classes and libraries 60
- public 70
- universities should give credit to sports and social programs as well as science 76
- Some people prefer to live in a small town. Others prefer to live in a big city. Which place would you prefer to live in? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 70
- Chaco Canyon 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 294, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...t could not be the Rembrants paintings. The lecturer challenges these claims. He is...
^^^
Line 1, column 358, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this assertion' or 'these assertions'?
Suggestion: this assertion; these assertions
...these claims. He is of the opinion that these assertion are correct. First, the writer conte...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 88, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...ing incampatible about the woman dress. there is inconsistency between a linen cap th...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 297, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
...n to details of his characters clothing.This argument is challenged by the lecturer....
^^^^
Line 7, column 132, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ces of wood connected together with glue , but Rembrandts painting were often on o...
^^
Line 7, column 191, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...ainting were often on one piece of wood.The lecturer, on the other hand, posits tha...
^^^
Line 7, column 310, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...he size of the painting by others later as well as the fur collar.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, may, second, secondly, so, well, whereas, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.4613686534 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1302.0 1373.03311258 95% => OK
No of words: 265.0 270.72406181 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91320754717 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55023584521 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 145.348785872 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554716981132 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 388.8 419.366225166 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 85.9641785862 49.2860985944 174% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.2 110.228320801 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5 21.698381199 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1 7.06452816374 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266893939713 0.272083759551 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.086738793375 0.0996497079465 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111227663067 0.0662205650399 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148597641825 0.162205337803 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0409152051822 0.0443174109184 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.3589403974 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.