The reading and the listening are both about R.Robustus which is not an active hunter rather scavenger. The author of the reading believes that there are 3 possible explanations regarding the issue of hunting. The Lecturer challenges the statements made by the author. She is of the opinion that R.robustus is an agile/vigorous hunter.
First of all, the author suggests that the size of r.robustus was similar to a cat which was way more smaller than the psittacosaurs. It is mentioned that due to this size difference the mammal(r.robustus) is would have been unable to successfully devour dinosaurs. This argument is challenged by the lecturer. She says that the remains which were found could be a residue of a baby dinosaur. Furthermore, she argues that R.robustus mass could be more than twice of its hunted animals which is a condition of preying.
Secondly, the writer contends that the leg size and oddity of position indicates its inability to chase after prey. The article notes that the dinosaur found on the stomach was too fast to capture. The lecturer, however, rebuts this by asserting that Tasmanian devil, which size and leg position are almost analogous to r.robustus.She elaborates on this by mentioning that it’s average running speed is up to 15km/h and which is quite fast.
Finally, it is stated in the article that while hunting and eating an animal by another animal, normally there exist teeth marks on the bones of the hunted animals. The author establishes that the bones which were found on the stomach don’t have any teeth mark on it and the founded animal on the stomach could be a small psittacosaur, came from an unguarded egg. The lecturer, on the other hand, posits that it could use powerful jaws for grabbing and holding an animal. She puts forth the idea that there is no evidence of back teeth of r.robustus, hence it could swallow an entire animal or into big pieces.
- TOEFL T P O 5 - Integrated Writing Task 3
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reason 57
- TPO-02 - Integrated Writing Task In many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team. Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages. 80
- TPO 1, Integrated Task 3
- TOEFL TPO 16 - Integrated Writing Task 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 48, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Robustus
...ding and the listening are both about R.Robustus which is not an active hunter rather sc...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 98, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'smaller' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: smaller
...stus was similar to a cat which was way more smaller than the psittacosaurs. It is mentioned...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 332, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: She
...tion are almost analogous to r.robustus.She elaborates on this by mentioning that i...
^^^
Line 5, column 421, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...;s average running speed is up to 15km/h and which is quite fast. Finally, it ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, regarding, second, secondly, while, as to, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 10.4613686534 220% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 12.0772626932 174% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1603.0 1373.03311258 117% => OK
No of words: 325.0 270.72406181 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93230769231 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74563278832 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 145.348785872 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532307692308 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 419.366225166 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.2697751482 49.2860985944 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.1875 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3125 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06452816374 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276999155621 0.272083759551 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0940858929494 0.0996497079465 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113001985559 0.0662205650399 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173819073651 0.162205337803 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0961483428746 0.0443174109184 217% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.3589403974 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 63.6247240618 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.