There are two different hypothesis made for the reason behind the decline of the sea otter population in western coast of North America. One is the increased level of pollution in such areas and the other is the orca which appears as the hunter of sea otter. While the reading believes the former to be the main reason of the decline, the lecturer gives some other information that supports the latter cause.
The first reason mentioned in the reading for supporting the pollution role is about investigating the areas which the decline is more and those seem to be where chemical pollution exist. The lecturer believes that if these species have died due to the pollution, we should have found the remained bodies of these creatures which we have not.
The second reason to back up the first theory is the decline of other sea species in this area such as seals and sea lions. The only exception is orcas which could resist the effect. This has been described as the reason for the second theory by the lecturer. The decline of the main prey of orcas which are whales resulted in hunting of the other species like seals and otters.
The last reason is the iregular pattern of decline. The lecturer believes this as another supporting information for the hunting idea. The otters disappeared in locations where orcas could reach and hunt them but not in the shallow waters which was unreachable by orcas.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 81
- the sea otter 71
- Playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them 81
- Altruism is a type of behavior in which an animal sacrifices its own interest for that of another animal or group of animals. Altruism is the opposite of selfishness; individuals performing altruistic acts gain nothing for themselves. Examples of altruism 73
- consequences of reading less literature. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 25, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'hypotheses', 'hypothesises'?
Suggestion: hypotheses; hypothesises
There are two different hypothesis made for the reason behind the decline ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 25, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'hypothesis' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'hypotheses', 'hypothesises'.
Suggestion: hypotheses; hypothesises
There are two different hypothesis made for the reason behind the decline ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...f these creatures which we have not. The second reason to back up the first theo...
^^^
Line 5, column 125, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... this area such as seals and sea lions. The only exception is orcas which could res...
^^^
Line 7, column 53, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...son is the iregular pattern of decline. The lecturer believes this as another suppo...
^^^
Line 7, column 136, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...rting information for the hunting idea. The otters disappeared in locations where o...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, so, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 22.412803532 49% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1169.0 1373.03311258 85% => OK
No of words: 245.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77142857143 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34836159178 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 145.348785872 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.49387755102 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 364.5 419.366225166 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5365513024 49.2860985944 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.4166666667 110.228320801 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4166666667 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 7.06452816374 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187271805521 0.272083759551 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0727925973816 0.0996497079465 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110738785107 0.0662205650399 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117026354268 0.162205337803 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106903113502 0.0443174109184 241% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.3589403974 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 12.2367328918 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 63.6247240618 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.