Some think that sending people to an asteroid would actually be the best colonization option for a number of reasons.
The reading passage and the lecture talk about the idea of asteroid colonization. Despite that, the professor states that the idea is not practical as it does not consider its disadvantages. He casts doubt on every single point the reading makes. In the lecture, he uses specific details to support his idea.
To begin with, the reading passage mentions that asteroids have lower gravity than planets because of their size. However, the speaker indicates low gravity presents other risks. The low gravity will result in muscle and bone density issues that as hurt human health. Therefore, the professor can not give a nod to the author in terms of the first point.
Secondly, about the mining of valuable metals, the author claims that the precious metal would bring wealth to an asteroid colony whereas the lecturer holds the view that the cost of transportation should be considered. Plus, the supply of metals may also change the price which causes the business not profitable as expected. Apparently, the professor's argument disproves its counterpart in the reading.
In addition, the reading passage suggests that some of the asteroids would be easy to reach. The professor, on the other hand, argues that easy to reach does not mean easy to return. Some asteroids may move away from Earth's orbit and it will be a great distance to travel in the end.
In conclusion, the author and the speaker hold conflicting views on this topic. It is clear that they will have problems finding common ground on this issue.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-24 | nikki07hung | 85 | view |
| 2020-11-12 | ipari5a | 65 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Because people are busy doing so many different things they do very few things well Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When teachers assign projects on which students must work together the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects Use specific reasons and examples to suppo 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Famous entertainers and athletes deserve to have more privacy than they have now Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 66
- Starting in the 1960s and continuing until the 1980s sailors in Russian submarines patrolling the North Atlantic and Arctic Ocean would occasionally hear strange sounds These underwater noises reminded the submarine crews of frog croaks so they called the 61
- Univeristy should use taxes to fully fund universities so that students can study for free 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 344, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professors'' or 'professor's'?
Suggestion: professors'; professor's
...profitable as expected. Apparently, the professors argument disproves its counterpart in t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 48, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...tion, the reading passage suggests that some of the asteroids would be easy to reach. The p...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, whereas, in addition, in conclusion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1272.0 1373.03311258 93% => OK
No of words: 255.0 270.72406181 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98823529412 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49358731567 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 145.348785872 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592156862745 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 379.8 419.366225166 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 2.5761589404 272% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.2007747673 49.2860985944 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.5 110.228320801 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9375 21.698381199 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0625 7.06452816374 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112773481932 0.272083759551 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0324404795674 0.0996497079465 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0580820965625 0.0662205650399 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0553710142429 0.162205337803 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0564574632652 0.0443174109184 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.3589403974 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 53.8541721854 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.0289183223 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.