Summarise the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage.
Rembrandt portrait
In this set of material, the reading section states that the portrait of an elderly woman in a white bonnet did not work by Rembrandt. The lecturer casts doubt on the main points made in the reading by providing three reasons.
The author claims that because of the way the woman dresses, it is not painted by him because he was known for his attention to the details of his subjects’ clothing. She rejects this point. After a thorough examination, they discovered that the fur collar added after a hundred years to make a painting more valuable.
The reading states that he was expert in paint shadow and light but in that painting part of the face was unclear. Nevertheless, she refuses this argument. as the fur collar added into original paint, part of the face became vague. while they remove an additional part, they found what would we expect from Rembrandt.
According to the reading, he always painted on a single part of the wood while the portrait painted on a panel that several pieces of wood glued together. The lecturer said the opposite of this point. As they added fur collar they had to enlarge the panel to make more ground. Also, they realize that the panel was the same as the tree that he used for his painting.
- In today s world it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct 76
- Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom 83
- Life today is easier and more comfortable than it was when your grandparents were children 70
- Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom. 66
- Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In this set of material, the reading sec...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... reading by providing three reasons. The author claims that because of the wa...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er to make a painting more valuable. The reading states that he was expert in...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 165, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: As
...evertheless, she refuses this argument. as the fur collar added into original pain...
^^
Line 5, column 241, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...l paint, part of the face became vague. while they remove an additional part, they fo...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...what would we expect from Rembrandt. According to the reading, he always pain...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 210, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...cturer said the opposite of this point. As they added fur collar they had to enlar...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, nevertheless, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1034.0 1373.03311258 75% => OK
No of words: 223.0 270.72406181 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.63677130045 5.08290768461 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38663623037 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 145.348785872 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529147982063 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 308.7 419.366225166 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.3947069551 49.2860985944 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.5384615385 110.228320801 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1538461538 21.698381199 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.61538461538 7.06452816374 37% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159634679381 0.272083759551 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0648656868945 0.0996497079465 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0692898911387 0.0662205650399 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110084322828 0.162205337803 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0761769752161 0.0443174109184 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 13.3589403974 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 53.8541721854 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 12.2367328918 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.17 8.42419426049 85% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 63.6247240618 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.