Summarise the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage.
The passage states that companies should offer their employees an option to work four days per week. It believes that it's beneficial for both companies and individuals, and provides three reasons for support. But the professor refutes this idea and states that offering a four-day week option won't affect the company profits, employee's life, and economy positively.
First, the passage says that a four-day week will increase company profits. But the professor opposes this point by saying that, working four-day week might force companies to spend even more. Adding new workers needs extra training and medical costs, and medical costs are the same for both four-day or five-day workers. Furthermore, new workers need more office spaces and more computers which increases costs. As a result company profits will cut down.
Second, the passage states that working four-day week will be beneficial to the economy too, and it will reduce the unemployment rate. On the other hand, the professor believes that the unemployment rate won't cut by providing a four-day week option. He explains that hiring new employees is costly and probably companies won't do this. Instead, they might force their employees to work overtime. It might increase the company’s expectations from employees to do a five-days job in four days. So this won't add new jobs, also it will make the current job more unpleasant.
Third, the passage asserts that employees will have more free time, and their quality of life will increase. However, the professor casts doubt on this point by saying that, it's true that workers' free time will increase, but it might increase the risks in their lives. It will decrease job stability and the chance of advancement in careers. The lecturer adds that four-days working employees are vulnerable to losing their job in the economic depression. Also, they will be passed over in promotions because companies prefer five-days workers in promoting to management positions since they can do supervisory in the entire week.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-29 | Opak Pulup | 3 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | NIMA SAEEDI | 3 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | NIMA SAEEDI | 3 | view |
| 2019-12-24 | NIMA SAEEDI | 80 | view |
| 2019-12-23 | NIMA SAEEDI | 80 | view |
- Nuclear energy 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?If people have the opportunity to get a secure job, they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying.Use specific reasons and ex 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to use printed material such as books and articles to do research than it is to use the internet. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO 22 – task 2: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to use printed material such as books and articles to do research than it is to use the internet. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 414, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...d more computers which increases costs. As a result company profits will cut down....
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, second, so, third, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 5.04856512141 337% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 15.0 7.30242825607 205% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 22.412803532 152% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1714.0 1373.03311258 125% => OK
No of words: 327.0 270.72406181 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24159021407 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56659290019 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 145.348785872 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51376146789 0.540411800872 95% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 419.366225166 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 1.51434878587 528% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.6327732265 49.2860985944 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.2105263158 110.228320801 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2105263158 21.698381199 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.89473684211 7.06452816374 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 4.33554083885 231% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.3589403974 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 63.6247240618 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.