summarize the points made in the lecture about Robert Peary's travel to north pole, being sure to explain how they oppose specific reasons made in the reading passage about Peary's trip.
The reading discusses Robert Peary a well known adventurer's travel to North Pole and generally supports its truth. However, the professor in the lecture, totally refuse to accept that this expedition can be real and gives three reasons to support her position about Peary's journey to north pole.
First, the passage mentions that this trip has been evaluated by a national geographic committee. In contrast, the professor believes that trusting in this investigation team would be wrong, since most of its members were consisted of Robert Peary’s friends who even assisted him by their funding to fulfill this trip. So, it would definitely be controvertial to trust their judgment about this expedition at all. Also, she adds that they just spended two days to authenticate all of the evidence provided for this journey, which is actually a short period of time for this amount of information assessment.
Second, the article talks about another person’s successful reaching to North Pole in a similar condition with which Robert got to the North Pole in 37 days. But, she refuses to accept this resemblence and indicates that Avery carried less bags and foods with himself than Robert Peary and got his food from the baggages which were thrown by airplanes in his route to north pole. In addition, he started his travel in a period of time that the weather was so much sever than Peary's trip time. Thus, this analogy can not be true.
Third, the reading considers the photo taken by him as evidence. On the other hand, professor opposes this idea and thinks that the photo is so much old to be used as a proof sign. Also, the shadows on it which determine the place of sun that can consequently confirm the location of image are so much faded that nothing can be derived from the picture accurately.
- summarize the points made in the lecture about problems with living in asteroids, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading about benefits of living in an asteroid. 80
- Is it better to enjoy your money when you earn it or is it better to save your money for some time in the future? Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 70
- People should be realistic rather than romantic in order to live a better life.do you agree or disagree with it? 73
- summarize the points made in the lecture about possibility of living in Venus planet, being sure to explain how they oppose specific points made in the reading about human life in Venus. 80
- summarize the points made in the lecture about applications of rounded stones discovered in ancient places, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on various hypothesis made in the passage about them. 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 483, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...y just spended two days to authenticate all of the evidence provided for this journey, whi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 556, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...this journey, which is actually a short period of time for this amount of information assessme...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 241, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun bags is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...blence and indicates that Avery carried less bags and foods with himself than Robert...
^^^^
Line 9, column 426, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...In addition, he started his travel in a period of time that the weather was so much sever than...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, consequently, first, however, second, so, then, third, thus, well, in addition, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 22.412803532 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 30.3222958057 142% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.01324503311 259% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1517.0 1373.03311258 110% => OK
No of words: 309.0 270.72406181 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90938511327 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55246064638 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 145.348785872 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582524271845 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 419.366225166 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.733421248 49.2860985944 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.692307692 110.228320801 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7692307692 21.698381199 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0769230769 7.06452816374 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2222670464 0.272083759551 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0815457712919 0.0996497079465 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0554207117692 0.0662205650399 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142036329408 0.162205337803 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.074866183572 0.0443174109184 169% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.3589403974 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 63.6247240618 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.