summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge the points that cloud seeding may have been effective in protecting crops from hail mentioned in the reading passage
In the reading passage, the author discusses several pieces of evidence that suggest the cloud seeding may have been effective in protecting crops from hail, while the lecture claims that what the passage state is not convincing and disputes those ideas presented in the passage with several proofs.
Firstly, according to the passage, it is suggested that laboratory experiments added silver iodide to cold water vapor and they observed light snow forming insted of hail pellets, which means that the cloud seeding is effective. On the contrary, the professor argues in the lecture that it is true that silver could cause light snow, but how could this result happen in real life? The sliver could prevent precipitation that forming the cloud including snow, rain and hail. In this case, there would be less rain on the ground, which would give rise to the risk of drought. Therefore, it could cause more damage to the crops.
In addition, the statement in the reading material indicates that the cloud seeding could be proved useful from several urban areas in Asian countries since it could control precipitation. On the contrary, the professor points out that what happeded in urban cities could not be easily repeated in village around United States. Because the urban has much air pollution that contains particles, the cloud seeding chemical could react with those particles and produce beneficial effect, but this method does not necessarily apply to US unpolluted farm areas.
Finally, the author of the reading claims that local studies also support the value of cloud seeding due to the fact that in some areas where cloud seeding was used reduced hail damage comparded to previous years. However, the speaker argues that the whole nation experiences less hail damage that year rather than the method-applied regions. This signified that this is due to the climate change occuring that year.
- summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they challenge the points that what might have caused the extinction of the sea cows mentioned in the reading passage 73
- summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they challenge the points that several reasons to explain the mass extinction mentioned in the reading passage 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement For a success in a future job the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school 81
- It is more important to read and watch news presented by people whose opinion is different from your own view than by people whose opinion are similar to yours 67
- Nowadays people are more willing to help the people who they don t know For example giving food and clothes to the people who need them than they were in the past 68
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, may, so, therefore, while, in addition, it is true, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 12.0772626932 157% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1595.0 1373.03311258 116% => OK
No of words: 311.0 270.72406181 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12861736334 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37773904212 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 145.348785872 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553054662379 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 419.366225166 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.5662086618 49.2860985944 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.916666667 110.228320801 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9166666667 21.698381199 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 7.06452816374 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257177025454 0.272083759551 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0776036039178 0.0996497079465 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0765441033744 0.0662205650399 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155836041896 0.162205337803 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0830823298561 0.0443174109184 187% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.3589403974 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 63.6247240618 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 10.7273730684 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, may, so, therefore, while, in addition, it is true, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 12.0772626932 157% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1595.0 1373.03311258 116% => OK
No of words: 311.0 270.72406181 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12861736334 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37773904212 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 145.348785872 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553054662379 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 419.366225166 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.5662086618 49.2860985944 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.916666667 110.228320801 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9166666667 21.698381199 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 7.06452816374 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257177025454 0.272083759551 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0776036039178 0.0996497079465 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0765441033744 0.0662205650399 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155836041896 0.162205337803 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0830823298561 0.0443174109184 187% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.3589403974 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 63.6247240618 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 10.7273730684 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.