Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage.
The lecture refers to some contrasting points with the points mentioned in the reading. In the reading, some disadvantages of the communal online encyclopedia are mentioned while the lecturer points out the reasons why they are not counted to be called as disadvantages.
In the lecture, the lecturer mentions the fact that despite having some negative points, communal online encyclopedias bring about some positive points that are undeniable. As a way of illustration, online encyclopedias are less likely to have errors than traditional ones. Moreover, there exist some ways such as making read-only files for avoiding some of the information mentioned in online encyclopedias. Furthermore, since online encyclopedias have some limitations in their capacity, extra information would be deleted by the community and there would be more emphasis on the significant parts.
In the reading passage, having more chance to have errors in online encyclopedias is mentioned whereas the lecturer refuses this point and specifies that online encyclopedias are less likely to have errors. In the reading, the risk for some articles of being changed by hackers is mentioned but the lecturer states the solutions used by the online encyclopedia community. The reading emphasizes some extra information and an improper sense of proportion in the online ones while the lecturer refuses this point.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-16 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 3 | view |
| 2023-07-16 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 3 | view |
| 2023-04-16 | rsheth05 | 80 | view |
| 2023-04-09 | prakriti malla | 90 | view |
| 2022-11-07 | GRACE_047 | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 350, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... as making read-only files for avoiding some of the information mentioned in online encyclo...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, whereas, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 12.0772626932 25% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 22.412803532 31% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1175.0 1373.03311258 86% => OK
No of words: 213.0 270.72406181 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51643192488 5.08290768461 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05139760659 2.5805825403 118% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 145.348785872 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507042253521 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 389.7 419.366225166 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.55342163355 116% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.438342483 49.2860985944 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.555555556 110.228320801 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 21.698381199 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55555555556 7.06452816374 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153417069041 0.272083759551 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0886974926071 0.0996497079465 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0616520404172 0.0662205650399 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139089763333 0.162205337803 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0595652383576 0.0443174109184 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.3589403974 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.8541721854 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.0289183223 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.2367328918 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.