Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt or supports on specific points made in the reading passage.
The reading and lecture are both about whether size of the brain relates to level of intelligence of person? The author of the reading states that although this might be true yet their are other principle factor such that affect intelligence of a person. The lecturer agrees with the author and states his view point in his favor.
Firsty, the author begins by stating that quality of tissue has a lot to do with one's smartness. In addition, it is related with the complexity of neuron connection, efficiency in producing and releasing neurotransmitters and so on. The lecturer corroborates this by illustrating the Einstine brain that is found to be intricate in nature. Furthermore, sensory and motor corices in his brain are proved to the reason for his intelligence.
Secondly, according to the writer, indeed brain size matters and they are seen in primates that assert large brain size. Additionally, this is because of the size of cerebral cortices directly connected with the demands of resides in complex network. The speaker, on other hand, states that this is speculated in the evolution of hominades as well. Moreover, owing to the neuron connection, humans are susceptible to create imaginary scenario, worrying, planning and so on.
Finally, the reading passage also notes that intelligence of person is impacted by cortical convolution which means the more the folding of brain surface, highly the chance for a person to be smart. The professor goes on to say that this has been seen in Einstine brain that no has ever exhibited the complexity of neural connections as his brain did. This why the degree of intelligence in his brain is profound.
As we can see, the author and lecturer holds same view point on components that affect smartness in person, the speaker effectively supports the writer's notion.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-05 | prakritii mallaa | 78 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 180, Rule ID: THEIR_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'there'?
Suggestion: there
...es that although this might be true yet their are other principle factor such that af...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 256, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...h that affect intelligence of a person. The lecturer agrees with the author and sta...
^^^
Line 2, column 82, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... quality of tissue has a lot to do with ones smartness. In addition, it is related w...
^^^^
Line 5, column 146, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
...n, the speaker effectively supports the writers notion.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, furthermore, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 30.3222958057 158% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1525.0 1373.03311258 111% => OK
No of words: 302.0 270.72406181 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04966887417 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83008772262 2.5805825403 110% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526490066225 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 419.366225166 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.752958718 49.2860985944 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.666666667 110.228320801 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1333333333 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 7.06452816374 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 4.33554083885 277% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101142170673 0.272083759551 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0350841690612 0.0996497079465 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0420805478112 0.0662205650399 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0660761765701 0.162205337803 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0452368979974 0.0443174109184 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.3589403974 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 63.6247240618 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.