Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the points made in the reading passage. You have 20 minutes to type your response.
In our planet named earth many living creatures live together. They all use feeding and other vital resources of this world. However, humans dominated their power and other living creatures were subsequently controlled by them. Therefore, some places like zoos were established by mankind to help animals have a better environment here. Although, some people strongly believe that zoo are not the best habitats for animals.
In the first paragraph, critics mentioned in the passage that animals were taken care adequately and zoo keepers tried their best to provide a healthy and enjoying environment for them.in spite of the fact that the lectures specialists suggested that this is just the cover of their true actions. For example, red pandas were a significant sign of their misleading and wrong behavior with animals.
Second, writers of the essay chiefly propose that zoos are becoming education centers for people to learn more about animals and specially the endangered species to help them understand how they can assist for enhancing their chance for existence. But, in the lecture, they fundamentally disagree with this concept due to poor managements happened in recent years for a number of animals.
Finally, it is clear that people in the lecture we listened have some huge disagreements with the readings writers about animals’ protection and how they must be treated in our world today.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In order to become financially responsible adults, children should learn to manage their own money at young age. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the points made in the reading passage. You have 20 minutes to type your response. 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign countries. 70
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the points made in the reading passage. You have 20 minutes to type your response. 60
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the points made in the reading passage. You have 20 minutes to type your response. 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 390, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n recent years for a number of animals. Finally, it is clear that people in the ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, for example, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1195.0 1373.03311258 87% => OK
No of words: 225.0 270.72406181 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31111111111 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66671851801 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631111111111 0.540411800872 117% => OK
syllable_count: 368.1 419.366225166 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 8.23620309051 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 76.1632457292 49.2860985944 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.5 110.228320801 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 21.698381199 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.1 7.06452816374 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.063325680446 0.272083759551 23% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.025590145211 0.0996497079465 26% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0334047834085 0.0662205650399 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0468808138152 0.162205337803 29% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0409877202728 0.0443174109184 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.3589403974 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.2367328918 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.42419426049 114% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 63.6247240618 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.