Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they respond to the specific concerns presented in the reading passage. Remove Salinity from The Salton Sea
The reading and lecture are both about <span class="hiddenGrammarError" pre="about "></span>the Salton Sea salinity, Which this salinity is harmful for fish and bird populations. The author of reading believes that there are some solutions to reduce the salt. The lecture challenges the statement made by the author. The professor is of the opinion that these ways are impractical.
First of all, the author suggests that salt can remove by desalination facilities because this system can evaporate water into steam while salt would be left behind. This idea is challenged by the lecture. She says that pump water into facilities is risky, because with this work salt and other materials change to solid form then the wind can spread these materials like selenium into the air. Therefore, people breathe the air which is deleterious for them; consequently, this action is not useful.
Secondly, the writer contends that can help from Water Ocean because this water has less salt from than the lake. The article notes the water ocean should inject into the lake by canals. The lecture, however, rebuts this by asserting that the government has not enough resources to build canals or pipelines. She elaborates on this by mentioning that the nearest shoreline has a long distance from the Salton Sea, so this way does need long canals, while the government cannot support to build the constructions for this distance.
Finally, it is stated in the article that would be to control salinity by walls. These walls separate the lake to different sections that small parts have much more salinity than large parts. The lecture, on the other hand, posits that the Salton Sea is located in a region that experiences geologically actions such as an earthquake. So, in this condition with first quake all walls fall down, then the water of low salinity sections mix with high salinity segments.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-18 | NIMA SAEEDI | 80 | view |
- If people want to contribute to the society, which of the following is the best way?A. riding bicycle or walking on footB. recycling the wasteC. buys local organic food. 70
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge the specific points made in the reading passage. Sending humans to asteroid 78
- Are governments doing well in educating people to pay attention to the importance of the food nutrition and healthy eating? 78
- In general, people are living longer now.Discuss the cause of this phenomenon. Use specific reasons and details to develop your essay. 76
- Now children do not behavior as well as the children did in the past. Which one of the following measure do you think can help children (age 5 – 10) behave better?1.Control the time they spend on TV or movie2.Take more time to chat with children.3.Monit 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 281, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... are some solutions to reduce the salt. The lecture challenges the statement made b...
^^^
Line 1, column 338, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...enges the statement made by the author. The professor is of the opinion that these ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, finally, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, while, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1604.0 1373.03311258 117% => OK
No of words: 310.0 270.72406181 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17419354839 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14402129878 2.5805825403 122% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 145.348785872 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564516129032 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 419.366225166 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.938515333 49.2860985944 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.25 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.375 21.698381199 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.375 7.06452816374 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128603872868 0.272083759551 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0436699940974 0.0996497079465 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.030499365852 0.0662205650399 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0797894650732 0.162205337803 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0313066157424 0.0443174109184 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 63.6247240618 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.