summarize the points made in the lecture you just heard, explaining how they cast doubt on the points made in the reading
The source discusses, rewarding an employee will increase in productivity?. The reading firmly arose some evidence to support the hypothesis that by rewarding workers feel motivated this will lead to an increase in productivity. However, the lecture repudiated what stated in reading resting upon fallacious premises and provides circumstances where rewarding leads to discouraging workers.
The passage claim that rewarding an employee for his hard work will improve productivity. Rewards such as money, special privileges or promotion will encourage the employee. The professor highlighted that this system is not working as expected. the lecturer counters this point by giving evidence that many employees did not like this system, they gave their opinion saying, they would rather be happy by receiving payment than rewards which are not useful, on top of that they like to receive respect for working harder.
The author argues that whatever the type of reward given, this will improve employees attitude, motivation, and productivity. On top of that, he mentions a business handbook describing compensation methods advocate giving greatest rewards to those who do the best. Notwithstanding, the professor highlighted that reward make production low, it punishes the employee. Workers feel they are manipulated, and they may not get expected reward. For example, one of the employees worked harder than the one who received the reward, this will make him discourage and feel disappointed. In addition, it will also cut the quality of work. If an employee finds any problem, but he will feel to consult a supervisor because it will give a negative impression. This will lead to a bad relationship with employee and supervisor
As noted earlier, rewarding an employee to increase productivity is not a good idea.we can find other ways to encourage them
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-24 | prakriti malla | 80 | view |
| 2022-12-06 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 66 | view |
| 2022-10-13 | Nina Tsarevich | 3 | view |
| 2022-08-04 | alicegreen13 | 3 | view |
| 2019-08-29 | Ranzit Thapa | 3 | view |
- summarize the points made in the lecture you just heard on tidal power, explaining how they cast doubt on the points made in the reading 90
- productivity and rewards, summarize the points made in the lecture you just heard on productivity and rewards, explaining how they cast doubt on the points made in the reading 3
- the best teacher is the one who is knowledgeable about the subject matter 70
- groupthink, summarize the points made in the lecture you just heard explaining how they cast doubt on the points made in the reading 3
- summarize the points made in the lecture you just heard on productivity and rewards, explaining how they cast doubt on the points made in the reading 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 22, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The source discusses, rewarding an employee will increase in p...
^^
Line 3, column 247, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...his system is not working as expected. the lecturer counters this point by giving ...
^^^
Line 5, column 216, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'giving the greatest'.
Suggestion: giving the greatest
...escribing compensation methods advocate giving greatest rewards to those who do the best. Notwi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, for example, in addition, such as, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 5.04856512141 257% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1581.0 1373.03311258 115% => OK
No of words: 290.0 270.72406181 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45172413793 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96239009138 2.5805825403 115% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 145.348785872 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579310344828 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 419.366225166 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 3.25607064018 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.131037166 49.2860985944 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.4 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 21.698381199 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.46666666667 7.06452816374 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0543972447247 0.272083759551 20% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0188785616642 0.0996497079465 19% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0353076467349 0.0662205650399 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0359571544993 0.162205337803 22% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0299385233252 0.0443174109184 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.3589403974 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.8541721854 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.2367328918 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 63.6247240618 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.