summerise the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific point made in the reading passage.
In this set of materials, the reading part introduces some kinds of stones that digging in North of Europe and introduce three theories and the listening section cast doubts the information presented in the passage and argues that reading theories are wrong, in addition, she says own reasons why these theories are not true.
First, the passage posits that carved stones balls are a weapon which humans used them in order to hunt 4000 years ago. However, the lecture makes the point that in spite of the fact that these stones have jagged edges, they could not use for hunting because these stones not enough danger so as to hunt animals.
Second, according to the text they had been used for measuring. the speaker disagrees with this point, and, asserts that carved stones balls were created with different kinds of stones so that these stones have different weight. therefore she refutes the claim of the passage.
Third, the article claims that these stones were the important social status of their owner. on the contrary, the lecture points out that these stones have simple shapes and patterns, hence they could not status.
In conclusion, the talk bolsters, the mentioned pieces of information in the passage.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-04 | salarmoheb | 3 | view |
| 2019-11-04 | salarmoheb | 3 | view |
| 2019-10-08 | salarmoheb | 80 | view |
| 2018-12-15 | salarmoheb | 90 | view |
| 2018-12-03 | salarmoheb | 3 | view |
- summerise the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific point made in the reading passage. 80
- summerise the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific point made in the reading passage. 88
- how do this idea in listening passage cast doubt on the ideas in the reading passage? 66
- some people to take a position in a company and work for the company. other people think it is better to go into business for themselves. which do you think is better? give reasons and examples to support your response. 68
- do you agree or disagree with the following statement? it is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. use specific reasons and examples to suppo 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 290, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
... because these stones not enough danger so as to hunt animals. Second, according to the...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 64, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
... text they had been used for measuring. the speaker disagrees with this point, and,...
^^^
Line 3, column 229, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
...hat these stones have different weight. therefore she refutes the claim of the passage. ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 229, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: therefore,
...hat these stones have different weight. therefore she refutes the claim of the passage. ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 93, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: On
...important social status of their owner. on the contrary, the lecture points out th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, however, if, second, so, therefore, third, as to, in addition, in conclusion, in spite of, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1019.0 1373.03311258 74% => OK
No of words: 204.0 270.72406181 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99509803922 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.2124901032 2.5805825403 86% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 145.348785872 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573529411765 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 298.8 419.366225166 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 80.2565331366 49.2860985944 163% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.222222222 110.228320801 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 21.698381199 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.3333333333 7.06452816374 189% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110211031334 0.272083759551 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0467991876762 0.0996497079465 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0307071065143 0.0662205650399 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0612309626506 0.162205337803 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0120177861595 0.0443174109184 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.3589403974 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 63.6247240618 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 10.7273730684 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.