summerise the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific point made in the reading passage.
In this set of materials the reading part discussed the problem of the population of frog species and probable solution, and, the listening section cast doubt on the information presented on the and argues that they are not a practical solution and don not protect frogs and do not make increase their population.
First, the passage posts that pesticides have a negative impact on the population of frogs and should eliminate. However, the lecture makes the point that this solution not economical and fair. farmers should use pesticides because without that not only their crops decrease but also they can not compete with other farmers. never do the pesticides have a severe impact on the population of the frogs. Hence, this solution doesn't have the potential to solve the problem.
Second, according to the text fungus. the speaker disagrees with this point, and, asserts that fungus spread all around the environment and it is not possible to omit them, not only does it is expensive but also is impossible. they produce new offsprings and diffuse again and again.
Third. the article claims that human activities and abuse in the using of water have negative effects. the lecture points out that although using water sources has a negative effect on the population of the frogs, global warming is a more important factor than it does. frogs are vulnerable in facing of warm and this phenomena makes the population of them increase and in the compration of decearising watter supply has more important effect in their population.
In conclusion, the talk bolsters, thementioned piece of information in the passage
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-04 | salarmoheb | 3 | view |
| 2019-11-04 | salarmoheb | 3 | view |
| 2019-10-08 | salarmoheb | 80 | view |
| 2018-12-15 | salarmoheb | 90 | view |
| 2018-12-03 | salarmoheb | 3 | view |
- summerise the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific point made in the reading passage. 3
- summerise the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific point made in the reading passage. 76
- do you agree or disagree with the following statement? leadership comes naturally: one can not learn to be a leader. use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- some people to take a position in a company and work for the company. other people think it is better to go into business for themselves. which do you think is better? give reasons and examples to support your response. 68
- summerise the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific point made in the reading passage. 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 195, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Farmers
... this solution not economical and fair. farmers should use pesticides because without t...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 326, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Never
...hey can not compete with other farmers. never do the pesticides have a severe impact ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 424, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...tion of the frogs. Hence, this solution doesnt have the potential to solve the problem...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 39, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
... Second, according to the text fungus. the speaker disagrees with this point, and,...
^^^
Line 5, column 191, Rule ID: DOES_NP_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'be'?
Suggestion: be
...possible to omit them, not only does it is expensive but also is impossible. they ...
^^
Line 5, column 191, Rule ID: DOES_X_HAS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'be'? As 'do' is already inflected, the verb cannot also be inflected.
Suggestion: be
...possible to omit them, not only does it is expensive but also is impossible. they ...
^^
Line 5, column 228, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...it is expensive but also is impossible. they produce new offsprings and diffuse agai...
^^^^
Line 7, column 8, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...s and diffuse again and again. Third. the article claims that human activities an...
^^^
Line 7, column 104, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...e using of water have negative effects. the lecture points out that although using ...
^^^
Line 7, column 271, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Frogs
...s a more important factor than it does. frogs are vulnerable in facing of warm and th...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 314, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...gs are vulnerable in facing of warm and this phenomena makes the population of them ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, second, so, third, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 7.30242825607 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 5.01324503311 319% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1361.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 267.0 270.72406181 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09737827715 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62747362859 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531835205993 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 422.1 419.366225166 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.6828239642 49.2860985944 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.692307692 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5384615385 21.698381199 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.38461538462 7.06452816374 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 4.19205298013 262% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.085487654808 0.272083759551 31% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0270140534438 0.0996497079465 27% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0327311685788 0.0662205650399 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0440401597906 0.162205337803 27% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0289848629976 0.0443174109184 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.7273730684 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.