taxes on cigarettes and unhealthy food
The article and the lecture are both about the high taxes on cigarettes and unhealthy food. While the article's author thinks that this policy is beneficial, the lecturer in the listening passage opposes the author's claims. She believes that all of these benefits can be defunded.
First, the reading starts by stating that the high taxes will prevent people from buying these cigarettes and unhealthy food . Thus, people will have a better and healthier behavior. The professor, however, disagrees with this viewpoint. Instead, She states that this is not quite true, because this will lead people to buy a cheaper cigarettes, which their quality is definitely worst, hence they will keep consuming them.
Second, the author also discusses that the taxes income can be used for meditaion. The professor points out that these high taxes are not fair. Because they do not take the individuals income in conseder. She holds that people with less income will have more problems than other with a high income.
Finally, the article mentions that the government can take advantage of the income frome these taxes for different projects.On the other hand, the lecturer states that this will encourage the government to supports the smoking so they wont lose this high income.
- what you will choose work alone or with your classmates 60
- The golden frog 60
- government should spend more money to improve the athletics or art 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement At universities and colleges sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support Use specific reasons and examples to support your ans 60
- do people pay a lot of money for their look 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 125, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ying these cigarettes and unhealthy food . Thus, people will have a better and hea...
^^
Line 5, column 44, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'taxes'' or 'tax's', 'taxis's'?
Suggestion: taxes'; tax's; taxis's
...ond, the author also discusses that the taxes income can be used for meditaion. The p...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 145, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...out that these high taxes are not fair. Because they do not take the individuals income...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 174, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
... not fair. Because they do not take the individuals income in conseder. She holds that peop...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 125, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: On
...rome these taxes for different projects.On the other hand, the lecturer states tha...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, hence, however, if, second, so, thus, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 15.0 30.3222958057 49% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1074.0 1373.03311258 78% => OK
No of words: 207.0 270.72406181 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1884057971 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37012891942 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 145.348785872 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570048309179 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 320.4 419.366225166 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 60.918661618 49.2860985944 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.5 110.228320801 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.25 21.698381199 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06452816374 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210158165242 0.272083759551 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0971634395394 0.0996497079465 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.170949243909 0.0662205650399 258% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131463437929 0.162205337803 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0773167312351 0.0443174109184 174% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.3589403974 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 63.6247240618 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.