The taxes of the cigarettes are similar to the purchases of cigarettes; the taxes of being high taxes on cigarettes and other unhealthy products has a number of social benefits. First of all, the taxes Smoking has declined as taxes on tobacco have risen, showing that these taxes do work to make society healthier. It can be expected that discourage people from indulging in unhealthy behaviors. Raising taxes on cigarettes, for instance, leads people to buy fewer of them. Imposing similar taxes on unhealthy food and beverages would help reduce obesity rates. Second, taxes of this kind are financially fair.When people get sick as a result of their smoking or eating unhealthy foods, they create medical costs. It is unfair that everyone in the society, including nonsmokers and people who follow a healthy diet, should contribute equally to covering these costs. Taxing people who Engage in unhealthy behaviors creates extra income that can be used to cover the medical costs. In this way, some of the financial burden is shifted from all of society to just those who choose to participate in the unhealthy activities. Finally, the high rate of Taxation on cigarettes significant increases revenue for the government. In addition to using this tax revenue on medical assistance,The governments of the benefit of the benefits of other projects that benefit public welfare, such as building stadiums or creating public parks. Even basic government-supported services like public education benefit from these taxes. Thus, the taxes on cigarettes, and the proposed taxes on unhealthy foods , benefit everyone.
The reading passage discusses the potential benefits which might arise from charging taxes on cigarettes and unhealthy food. The lecturer, however, casts doubt on the reasons proposed by the reading passage and refutes them one by one.
At first, the reading states that charging taxes on cigarettes have discouraged people from buying them and it is expected that charging taxes on unhealthy food would help to solve the problem. Conversely, the lecturer believes that charging taxes will not lead to healthy behavior. She argues that after rising taxes some of the smokers have turned to a cheaper cigarette with a lower quality which is deleterious for their health. She thinks that this can happen to food consumers who continue to use junk food and spend less money on healthy food and damage even more.
Furthermore, the reading suggests that putting taxes on cigarettes and unhealthy food is fair for everyone because, in this manner, those who have consumed more of this unhealthy products will have to cover most of the financial burden created by them. On the contrary, the lecturer maintains that fairness is a different way of approach in this manner. She offers that in this manner peoples income will not be considered and the ones with lower income will have to pay as much as the higher income. It is a much heavier burden for individuals with lower income.
Finally, the reading mentions that an increase in the revenues will increase government incomes. It offers that government can spend this money not only on medical assistance but also it can spend it on the projects that will benefit the public the most. In contrast, the lecturer states that this idea has its own downsides. She offers that the income from this taxation will be millions of dollars and governments will depend on it and will not seize to use it. The professor believes that the governments cannot do a radical work on pursuing and eliminating the unhealthy food and smoke if it counts on the money it acquires from taxes on these products. It will not pass laws that diminish the use of cigarettes for example in the public areas.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-21 | r.mahdavi70@gmail.com | 73 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Movies and television have more negative effects thanpositive effects on the way young people behave. 73
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge the specific arguments presented in the reading passage 3
- At the end of the Triassic period 200 million years ago, there was a mass-extinction event that caused the extinction of more than half of all living species. It was this extinction event that allowed dinosaurs to become the dominant species for the next 73
- If people want to contribute to the society, which of the following is the best way?1. riding bicycle or walking on foot2. recycling the waste3. buying local organic food 73
- The taxes of the cigarettes are similar to the purchases of cigarettes; the taxes of being high taxes on cigarettes and other unhealthy products has a number of social benefits. First of all, the taxes Smoking has declined as taxes on tobacco have risen, 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 319, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ior. She argues that after rising taxes some of the smokers have turned to a cheaper cigare...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, so, for example, in contrast, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 5.04856512141 317% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 12.0772626932 157% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 22.412803532 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 30.3222958057 148% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1777.0 1373.03311258 129% => OK
No of words: 362.0 270.72406181 134% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90883977901 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.04702891845 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46400323169 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 145.348785872 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.475138121547 0.540411800872 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 542.7 419.366225166 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.9399743947 49.2860985944 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0625 110.228320801 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.625 21.698381199 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.875 7.06452816374 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 4.45695364238 224% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217159850841 0.272083759551 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0780170375943 0.0996497079465 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0940736795376 0.0662205650399 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147302070004 0.162205337803 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0684709328908 0.0443174109184 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 63.6247240618 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.