technolgy advance car are good or not
The article states that as technology will provide smart car, that has computer set up and drive by itself causes many benefits like drive safely, quicker and less expensive. However, the professor sees flaws in this article and explained every point in her lecture.
To begin with the first point illustrated by author about advance cars is, they will prevent many accidents and save many lives because they have special sensor that can detect obstacle, automatic brake. However, the professor explained a legitimate point against this benefit is that there are chances that technology fails, and when this will happen it could make the situation more devastating. As there will be many cars driving on road, and fails its sensor and collide with other, this will cause pileup accidents as car was drive by technology and no way to prevent this situation and ultimately it could cause more accidents and no chance to save life.
To move on next point stated by the author is that traffic problem will disappear, and commuting by a car also cause advantage as most people travel by a car, and it is maintaining a good people prefer it more. The professor again disagree with this point and illustrated that it is correct if technology increases highway speed cause less commuting time. However, the points to focus is more people will drive as driving is convincing causes increase in traffic and again situation become same as started more traffic and less commuting.
The another point made by author is that it lead to less expenses spend on repair and replacement because smart cars are programmed to drive the most direct routes. The professors sees flaws in this statement too. She stated that the sensor, smart car uses is of much cost and if this get any problem then could lead to a more expense then normal car, normal repair.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-03 | Uttama Shekhawat | 73 | view |
- old friend or new friend 70
- waster island population decline 76
- 20 years car will be used more or less 80
- Some people like to do only what they already do well Other people prefer totry new things and take risks Which do you prefer Use specific reasons and examples to support your choice 73
- Some people like to do only what they already do well Other people prefer totry new things and take risks Which do you prefer Use specific reasons andexamples to support your choice 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 12, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The article states that as technology will provide s...
^^
Line 7, column 53, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun expenses is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...point made by author is that it lead to less expenses spend on repair and replacemen...
^^^^
Line 7, column 181, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'see'.
Suggestion: see
... the most direct routes. The professors sees flaws in this statement too. She stated...
^^^^
Line 7, column 336, Rule ID: LESS_MORE_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'?
Suggestion: than
...oblem then could lead to a more expense then normal car, normal repair.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, so, then, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 17.0 7.30242825607 233% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1538.0 1373.03311258 112% => OK
No of words: 314.0 270.72406181 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89808917197 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37827094003 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.484076433121 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 477.0 419.366225166 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 21.2450331126 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.4482857868 49.2860985944 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.818181818 110.228320801 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5454545455 21.698381199 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45454545455 7.06452816374 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137414227445 0.272083759551 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0534424599653 0.0996497079465 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0569227283001 0.0662205650399 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0828675384495 0.162205337803 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0224260387052 0.0443174109184 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.3589403974 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 53.8541721854 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.0289183223 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.498013245 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.