The text is about decrease in the number of people who read literature books and explains how it has happened and what are its consequences by providing three reasons. The professor opposes these reasons and goes against all of them and explains why these change has happened.
The text is about decrease in the number of people who read literature books and explains how it has happened and what are its consequences by providing three reasons. The professor opposes these reasons and goes against all of them and explains why these change has happened.
Firstly, the text claims that intellectual stimulation can be found only in literature books and these books can provide so many benefits for us and this is while other books cannot have this effect. The professor refutes this claim and says that, reading is not just about literature books and other topic like science, history and politics are also some fields which can be really precious and helpful. She also states that these fields can be as creative as literature and they can provide intellectual stimulation as much as literature can.
Secondly, the text explains that some self-helping books or television programs which people are more interested to them, rather than literature books, has nothing to do with the increase of the culture in societies and also new books are poorly writing and does not worth reading. However, the professor opposes this point and says that we cannot cast any doubt on this point that nowadays people are spending less time on reading books and prefer to watch movies instead, but movies and musics can help to increase culture of societies too. She states that culture has changed and nowadays movies and musics can speak more directly about culture than books.
Thirdly, the text says that there are so many good writers these days but based on the lack of readers, publishers prefer invest less on books and it leads to decrease of writer's number too. The professor opposes this point and says that we all know that these days’ authors get less support, but it is not just because people read less. She states that this problem is due to author's fault and as long as their writings are too difficult to be understood, they will not get enough support and cannot gain new readers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-07-03 | nastaran1992 | 73 | view |
- Anting in birds and some possible benefits of it. 73
- The text is about decrease in the number of people who read literature books and explains how it has happened and what are its consequences by providing three reasons. The professor opposes these reasons and goes against all of them and explains why these 73
- acting 63
- Some parents forbid young children from owning smart phones (cell phones with Internet access), while others disagree and believe that they are important tools for keeping in touch. Which point of view do you think is better, and why? 70
- the appearance of professors on the television and its advantages and disadvantages 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, really, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 5.04856512141 238% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 26.0 7.30242825607 356% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 22.412803532 174% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1677.0 1373.03311258 122% => OK
No of words: 343.0 270.72406181 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88921282799 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34496956663 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 145.348785872 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.478134110787 0.540411800872 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 500.4 419.366225166 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 21.2450331126 146% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.8639351437 49.2860985944 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.454545455 110.228320801 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.1818181818 21.698381199 144% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.27272727273 7.06452816374 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.405628599678 0.272083759551 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.180981676795 0.0996497079465 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.195794530244 0.0662205650399 296% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.340647397964 0.162205337803 210% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.349045582675 0.0443174109184 788% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.3589403974 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 53.8541721854 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.0289183223 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.498013245 137% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.