There is a reading passage in which the writer states that humans and other mammals beheave alturistic. On the other hand, the lecturer rejects this claim with some examples in the listening part. Write an essay to contrast them.
In this set of materials both the writer and lecturer are discussing about the alturism. Alturism is a type of behavior in which a person sacrifices its own interest for that of his or her groups. They are totally disagree with each others. While the writer claims that humans and mamals behave generally in alturistic ways while the lecturer states that they do not act to sacrifices themselves. In the following paragraphs it will be explained with several examples.
Firstly, the writer gives an example shows that take risks for their life to save their group as a guard. On the contary with it, the lecturer states that the guard meerkat eat before standing guard. So it does not face with the caution of death.
Moreover the writer points out that the guard meerkat has to flee alone after it issues an alarm. Unlike the writer, the lecturer states that the meerkats have their own alarm system for survival.
Furthermore, there is an example about the humans behaviors as a proof that they behave in alturistic ways. Adverse the writer, according to the lecrurer it is true that people can donate their organs to people they do not know. But it is not alturism because the donator people gains social respect.
All in all, the lecturer totally opposes to the writer's allegations. The lecturer rejects the writer in all aspects and shows us that human or other mammals do not behave alturistically.
- Television advertising directed toward young children aged two to five should not be allowed Do you agree or disagree with this idea Explain it by giving specific examples 87
- It is important to keep your old friends than t is to make new friends. Do you agree, or disagree with this statament. Use specific reasons and examples to explain your idea. 73
- There is a writing about a painting which is said that it is not a painting of Rembrandt, and there is a lecture about it which is said that it is Rembrandt's painting. Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure explain how they answer the 73
- There is a writing in which it is stated that appearing on television brings benefits to professors, universities and public. On the contarary, in the listening passage the lecturer opposes this idea. Summarize the point mad in the lecture, being sure to 73
- There is a listening passage in which the lecturer explains global warming causes, and in the reading passage the writer opposes the lecturer’s ideas. Summarize the point made in the lecture, explaining how they cast doubt on points made in the reading. 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 215, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'disagreed'.
Suggestion: disagreed
... of his or her groups. They are totally disagree with each others. While the writer clai...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
... not face with the caution of death. Moreover the writer points out that the guard me...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, so, while, as to, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1177.0 1373.03311258 86% => OK
No of words: 242.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86363636364 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44463662066 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.54958677686 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 361.8 419.366225166 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.3403128658 49.2860985944 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 78.4666666667 110.228320801 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1333333333 21.698381199 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.06666666667 7.06452816374 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234908837572 0.272083759551 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0737562208557 0.0996497079465 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0535264439345 0.0662205650399 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123372195714 0.162205337803 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0443758325406 0.0443174109184 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.3589403974 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.61 12.2367328918 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.