Thousands of animals currently reside in zoos around the world. Recently, there has been much debate about the value of zoos in today's world. Careful consideration of the facts reveals that zoos are unethical and should be closed.
First, defenders of zoos say that they are an important way of saving animals from extinction. However, in actuality, zoos have had very little success in protecting animals. One reason for this is because many animals do not thrive in zoos. Breeding in captivity is often .difficult to encourage. Endangered animals fare far better with protection programs that allow them to stay in the wild.
Additionally, zoos do not adequately provide animals with living spaces that are like their natural habitats. As a result, animals are not able to behave as they normally would. For example, a lion in a small cage is not able to run around, much less hunt. In the end, the animals end up depressed or with behavioral problems. This would not occur, of course, if they were not kept in zoos in the first place.
Finally, zoos simply are not the best way to study animals. There are a number of well-researched books available. Alternately, wildlife biologists stand to gain much more knowledge about animals by observing them in the wild. That way, they see how animals interact with other creatures without human interference.
Both the reading and the lecture are about the zoos and the benefit of harm of them for wild animal. While the article proposes three arguments to critic the zoos and enumerate their disadvantage for wild, the lecturer, however, disargues those reasons and asserts that zoos benefit not only wild but also human.
Firstly, the article avers that zoos has very little porfit for endangered animal and it cold not save animal from extinction risk. On the other hand, the professor rebuts this notion by explaining that zoos have ic=ncredeably effect on saving endengered animal. He exemplifies this plus with mentioning that Californis Condor which was in extinction risk and its population has decreased dramatically benefits from this captive breading program. He mentions that after they have reproduced in zoos and they trived and their number increased to 330 individuals they released to wild. They could not surrvive without help of this program, the professor says.
Secondly, the author claims that zoos don't provide enough space for animals. Hence, they do not behave like natural behave in the wildlife. Conversely, the speaker challenges this point by saying that modern zoos apply new natural habitat philosophy which means they provide a large space for them to feel living like natural. He mentions a novel zoo in north Calrolina which has a three hundred acres for animal. With this strategy animal feel comfortable and zookepper can keep them safeer than ever.
Finally, the passage posits that zoos are not the best way to study animals. Wildlife biologists belive that animal should be obserevd in the wild habitat where humans will not interfer with their natural life. Controversially, the lecturer repudiates this idea by explaining that seeing live animal is something that is worth more than reading books. He adds seeing a silver-back lizard in zoos is so wonderful. Seeing wild animal in a good protection life is awesome. He dds that there are thousands biology book but they are not equal to seeing them. Inthe end he believes that zoos have obvioius benefits for wild animal.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-22 | Winner_007 | 80 | view |
| 2020-12-22 | Winner_007 | 80 | view |
| 2020-12-22 | Winner_007 | 80 | view |
| 2020-12-22 | Winner_007 | 76 | view |
| 2020-12-22 | Winner_007 | 65 | view |
- Some people prefer to focus on ambitious dreams while others think realistic goals are more important Which do you prefer and why 70
- tpo 31 11
- Populations of the yellow cedar a species of tree that is common in northwestern North America have been steadily declining for more than a century now since about 1880 Scientists have advanced several hypotheses explain this decline One hypothesis is tha 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to make friends with intelligent people than with the people who have a good sense of humor 70
- TPO 36- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?For the successful development of a country, it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children(five to ten years old) than to spend money on universit 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...benefit not only wild but also human. Firstly, the article avers that zoos has...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of this program, the professor says. Secondly, the author claims that zoos do...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 44, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... Secondly, the author claims that zoos dont provide enough space for animals. Hence...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...epper can keep them safeer than ever. Finally, the passage posits that zoos ar...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, finally, first, firstly, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 22.412803532 192% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1762.0 1373.03311258 128% => OK
No of words: 344.0 270.72406181 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12209302326 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50129766213 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 145.348785872 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563953488372 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 540.9 419.366225166 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.3400815139 49.2860985944 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.7368421053 110.228320801 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1052631579 21.698381199 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06452816374 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 4.33554083885 254% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205920904548 0.272083759551 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0720447929845 0.0996497079465 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.048623735163 0.0662205650399 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138491597239 0.162205337803 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0226536582204 0.0443174109184 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 63.6247240618 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.