Tidal Power
The reading and the lecture are both about the use of Tidal Power for producing energy in a seawater environment. The writer believes that Tidal Power is an great source of energy to avoid using fossils. The lecturer challenges the statements mande by the author. She is of the opinion that there are many drawbacks in the application of this method for generating energy.
First of all, the writer argues that the installation of gater and machines on aquatic areas in a wise way to produce energy. It is mentioned that as the gates open and water gets into the dam, the force inside this produces energy. However, the professor refutes this by asserting that this routine might bring many environmental consequences in the ambient. For example, this leads to a reduce in life´s quality in that environment, such as in birds and fish. Additionally, it contributes to the grow of a negative organism and to the destruction of the natural habitat.
Secondly, the author states that this is a renewable, non-affecting and productive energy. On the other hand, the lecturer elaborates on this by mentioning that this will affect people in the area. She puts forth the idea that fishing boats are not going to be capable to move on the water’s surface because of the gates. As a result, economy in the zone might decreace due to the lack of this activity.
What’s more, fish are not able to migrate to other waters because of the wall constructed in the dam, and design a bareer with space for the fish to migrate will undoubtedly rise the cost of production
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-06 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 66 | view |
| 2021-01-23 | Tanmay97 | 70 | view |
| 2020-11-28 | vishaljuvekar10 | 85 | view |
| 2020-10-05 | vishaljuvekar10 | 3 | view |
| 2020-10-03 | Akhil_Maddukuri | 78 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Grades encourage students to learn. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 70
- Productivity and rewards 71
- Tidal Power 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Television has destroyed communication among friends and family. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- The widespread use of the internet has given people access to information on a level never experienced before. How does this increase in the availability of information influence life in today´s world? 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 155, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...The writer believes that Tidal Power is an great source of energy to avoid using f...
^^
Line 1, column 205, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ource of energy to avoid using fossils. The lecturer challenges the statements mand...
^^^
Line 3, column 94, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a wise way" with adverb for "wise"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... of gater and machines on aquatic areas in a wise way to produce energy. It is mentioned that...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 217, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'produces'' or 'produce's'?
Suggestion: produces'; produce's
...ets into the dam, the force inside this produces energy. However, the professor refutes ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 388, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...the ambient. For example, this leads to a reduce in life's quality in that environm...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 500, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...d fish. Additionally, it contributes to the grow of a negative organism and to the destr...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, for example, such as, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 30.3222958057 145% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1308.0 1373.03311258 95% => OK
No of words: 271.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82656826568 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75316321365 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 145.348785872 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542435424354 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.0188879206 49.2860985944 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.4285714286 110.228320801 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3571428571 21.698381199 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07142857143 7.06452816374 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110108087286 0.272083759551 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0443724090083 0.0996497079465 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108725652456 0.0662205650399 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0741396180019 0.162205337803 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.128413585233 0.0443174109184 290% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 12.2367328918 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 63.6247240618 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.