Unlike the passage, which supports the claim of full-length portrait was related to the famous English novelist Jane Austen. The speaker disagrees with all claims made in the passage and provides details. He says that the evidence of linking the claims to Jane Austen portrait is not convincing, as it might be loosely connected to one of her relatives.
First of all, the article states that Austen's family authorized the use of this portrait in en edition of some of her letters, which confirms that this teenage girl portrait is for her. However, the professor opposes this claim by mentioning that her family has authorized the use of the portrait after seventy years of Austen's death. Therefore, they had never seen her and no one could have know how she looked like.
Secondly, the speaker disagrees with the claim that this teenage girl portrait looks like Cassandra's portrait, which mentioned in the article. The speaker says that the resemblance was extended very large between her family. He says that she had a lot of females and cousins in the same age. Furthermore, most of experts believe that this portrait belongs to one of her distance niece called Marry Comban.
Lastly, the speaker opposes that claim that the style of the painting is the same as Ozias Humphry, who was a famous painter at this time. The professor says that they have found a black campaign as a stamp on the back of the portrait. This black campaign mentions that the material of the portrait was sold by someone called William Leg. Moreover, the evidence showed that William did not sell material while Austen was a teenager. William started selling this material when Austen was twenty seven years, which confirms that this portrait for someone older than Austen.
- TPO-07 - Integrated Writing Task In an effort to encourage ecologically sustainable forestry practices, an international organization started issuing certifications to wood companies that meet high ecological standards by conserving resources and recyclin 67
- TOEFL T P O 12 Integrated Writing Task 60
- TPO-09 - Integrated Writing Task Car manufacturers and governments have been eagerly seeking a replacement for the automobile's main source of power, the internal-combustion engine. By far the most promising alternative source of energy for cars is the hy 86
- TPO-26 - Integrated Writing Task The zebra mussel, a freshwater shellfish native to Eastern Europe, has long been spreading out from its original habitats and has now reached parts of North America. There are reasons to believe that this invasion cannot b 76
- TOEFL T P O 11 Integrated Writing Task 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 393, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'known'.
Suggestion: known
...ad never seen her and no one could have know how she looked like. Secondly, the s...
^^^^
Line 5, column 306, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the experts') or simply say ''most experts''.
Suggestion: most of the experts; most experts
...d cousins in the same age. Furthermore, most of experts believe that this portrait belongs to o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 488, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: twenty-seven
...d selling this material when Austen was twenty seven years, which confirms that this portrai...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, lastly, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 20.0 12.0772626932 166% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 22.412803532 165% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1469.0 1373.03311258 107% => OK
No of words: 297.0 270.72406181 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94612794613 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36312310369 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511784511785 0.540411800872 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 435.6 419.366225166 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.5569586349 49.2860985944 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.9333333333 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06452816374 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.408297725138 0.272083759551 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145688364862 0.0996497079465 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0965683571325 0.0662205650399 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.26551181321 0.162205337803 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.061808931371 0.0443174109184 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.