The quality of education represents controversial issue nowadays. There are many ways to improve the quality of education. Some people believe that increasing salaries for university’s professors would improve the quality of education, others oppose this opinion. I completely agree with increasing professor's salaries would improve the quality of education for many reasons, which I will explore in the next paragraphs.
First of all, it is undeniable fact that there are uncountable tasks for professors in improving the quality of education. The professors responsible for doing many things like student's grades, student's performance, student's personality and attitude as well, so if university wants to improve any of those factors to improve the quality of education, therefore it should start with professors motivation by increasing their salaries. My experience is a compelling example. My wife works in California School as an instructor for medical assistant classes. She has more than twenty students in her class, which means that her class is really big comparing with other classes. She received a salary increase last month, which encouraged her to spend more time with each single student, and this helped her students to understand better and gain more skills. This is the reason why her students more skillful than other students on other classes, because the other class's instructor do not spend extra time with her students. As you can see, increasing professor's salary would help student to perform better, and this reflect positively on the quality of education.
Secondly, increasing professor's salary would encourage professors to work on themselves and improve their personality skills and their way with students, which will improve quality of education. Professors must have many ways and teaching techniques because most students are different from each other. The professional professors would improve their skills by buying books to read and taking online classes, they would not do so unless they received increased salaries each year. For instance, my wife after she has received her new increased high salary that mentioned before, she starts looking online for an academic class to improve her personality skills, which cost her 5000 dollar. This expensive course increased her knowledge and she learned new ways to deal with students. As you can see, if she had not received salary increase, she would not have taken this online course and improved herself, and as a result, the quality of education would not have been improved.
In conclusion, I strongly agree with the statement that to improve the quality of education, university should spend more money on professor's salary. Because this would motivate professors to spend extra time with students, encourage professors to work on themselves by taking online classes and buying books, and finally will improve the quality of education.
- TPO-20 - Integrated Writing Task In the United States, it had been common practice since the late 1960s no to suppress natural forest fires. The “let it burn” policy assumed that forest fire would burn themselves out quickly, without causing much dama 63
- TOEFL T P O 12 Integrated Writing Task 60
- TPO-05 - Integrated Writing Task As early as the twelfth century A.D., the settlements of Chaco Canyon in New Mexico in the American Southwest were notable for their "great houses," massive stone buildings that contain hundreds of rooms and often stand th 78
- TOEFL T P O 11 Integrated Writing Task 68
- TPO-26 - Integrated Writing Task The zebra mussel, a freshwater shellfish native to Eastern Europe, has long been spreading out from its original habitats and has now reached parts of North America. There are reasons to believe that this invasion cannot b 65
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 382, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ducation, therefore it should start with professors motivation by increasing thei...
^^
Line 3, column 1052, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professors'' or 'professor's'?
Suggestion: professors'; professor's
...er students. As you can see, increasing professors salary would help student to perform be...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 22, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professors'' or 'professor's'?
Suggestion: professors'; professor's
...y of education. Secondly, increasing professors salary would encourage professors to wo...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 916, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ne course and improved herself, and as a result, the quality of education would n...
^^
Line 7, column 132, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professors'' or 'professor's'?
Suggestion: professors'; professor's
..., university should spend more money on professors salary. Because this would motivate pro...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, look, really, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for instance, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2487.0 1977.66487455 126% => OK
No of words: 456.0 407.700716846 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45394736842 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62105577807 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76939476434 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.436403508772 0.524837075471 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 763.2 618.680645161 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.7108244245 48.9658058833 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.35 100.406767564 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.7 5.45110844103 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204411790098 0.236089414692 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0859086218845 0.076458572812 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0793014852858 0.0737576698707 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169455779508 0.150856017488 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0571197833551 0.0645574589148 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 11.7677419355 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 58.1214874552 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.1575268817 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 10.9000537634 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.