The reading and the lecture are both about source of quackers. Whereas the author of the reading states theories about what might have caused that, the lecturer suggests that theories are strong but still there are debates among explorers. The lecturer casts doubt on the main points made in the reading by providing three reasons.
First of all, according to the reading, male and female orca whales may cuased that sounds dauring a courtship ritual. However, the professor disputes this point. She says that it is highly unlikely. Furthermore, she mentions that whales live near of the surface but submarines dive in deep ocean so they can not hear it even. Also, whales can be seen in submarines radar.
Secondly, the reading states that the sounds were caused by gaint squid. Nevertheless, the lecturer refutes this argument. She argues that sounds disappeared for two decades. In addition, she points out that sounds seems unrelated to giant squid, because it is not explain why it been disappeared for 20 years and then suddenly continued.
Finally, the reading claims that sounds could come from some military technology, like another countray submarines. On the other hand, the professor believe that this theory is not hold up. She thinks that source changes its own direction quickly and noise from engine is so different. Moreover, she states that changing source of sounds quickly is difficult for submarines, plus, even nowadays there isn't any technology to produce that sound.
In conclusion, although the reading and the lecture are both about theories around source of quackers, the three main theories made in the reading are effectively challenged by the professor.
- It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends 66
- TOEFL T P O 32 Integrated Writing Task 3
- TOEFL T P O 32 Integrated Writing Task 3
- The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict 88
- The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 266, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'explained'.
Suggestion: explained
...lated to giant squid, because it is not explain why it been disappeared for 20 years an...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 402, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...r submarines, plus, even nowadays there isnt any technology to produce that sound. ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, still, then, whereas, in addition, in conclusion, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1423.0 1373.03311258 104% => OK
No of words: 273.0 270.72406181 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21245421245 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49360975349 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582417582418 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 416.7 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.02248619 49.2860985944 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.7058823529 110.228320801 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0588235294 21.698381199 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8823529412 7.06452816374 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.3589403974 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.