The article is about theories related to quacker sounds Russian sailors in submarines heard and there are three main theories article discusses. However, the professor refutes all the theories providing strong evidences.
First theory suggest that the quackers are from orca whales during a courtship ritual. The professor refutes this point by saying that it is impossible to hear orca whale sound to a submarine. This is because orca whales are surface animals while submarines usually patrolling in deep , where sound does not reach from surface level surfaces.
Second idea is that sounds were caused by giant squid. However, the professor says that this is highly unlikely. According to the professor squids were around the aforementioned area all the times and still are, however the after 1980's sailors did not hear quacker sounds. Professor explains that there is no clear reason to giant squid stop emitting these sounds.
A third theory suggest that these sounds were from a military technology, like secret submarine from another country. The professor opposes this based on two main arguments. First is the quacker sound sources and change the direction of moving suddenly while submarines are unable to control in such way. Secondly, there should be engine sounds from submarines which sailors never detected.
- Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past. 71
- It is more important for students to understand ideas and concepts than it is for them to learn facts 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People in today s world have become too dependent on automobiles Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 45
- TPO 35 Integrated Writing Task 90
- Cane toad 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 285, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...le submarines usually patrolling in deep , where sound does not reach from surface...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, second, secondly, so, still, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1124.0 1373.03311258 82% => OK
No of words: 209.0 270.72406181 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37799043062 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43668113753 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.588516746411 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 337.5 419.366225166 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.2411808599 49.2860985944 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.4615384615 110.228320801 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0769230769 21.698381199 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.38461538462 7.06452816374 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.3589403974 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 63.6247240618 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.