Top 44
In term of whether the European silver coin which found at a site in the state of Maine in the united states, brought by European explorer who named Norse, the author and, the lecturer contradict each other. The author in the article claims that some archaeologists believe that the coin is not a genuine piece of historical evidence and that is fake and states some reasons, on the other hand, the professor in the lecture asserts that some other archaeologists believe that this coin is precious evidence.
First the author claims that the location which the coin was discovered located very far from Norse settlement which is more than a thousand kilometers, in contrast, the lecturer refute this claims and states that this is not a great distance because many native American traveled this distance for other objects and come from far away for other things and back to their settlements, therefore, this location is not great distance.
secondly, the reading states that second problem is that no other coins have been found in this site and this evidence proves that the coin is fake. on the contrary, the professor contends that this settlement was temporary for Norse and he back to Europe frequently. Thus, he packed up everything and the coin consequently, he returned to Europe.
Finally, the article asserts that the silver coins were useless for native American because these coins had wide use in Europe at the time. the speaker refutes this claims and states that North American did not recognize the silver coins as money but, these coins were attractive and appealed people to gather these coins as jewelry hence, it could prove that as these coins were beauty the American people tended to gather these objects.
In the nutshell, according to the aforementioned reasons the professor in the lecture cast doubt about author claims.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-20 | Seema Modak | 73 | view |
| 2019-01-22 | 30vil | 3 | view |
- People attend college or university for many different reasons (for example, new experiences, career preparation, and increased knowledge). Why do you think people attend college or university? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Tpo 42 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Older teenager (16-19) should be allowed to work at paid part-time job? 73
- TPO 40.Some parents offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school. Do you think this is a good idea? 70
- TPO50 -Integrated task 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 72, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e location which the coin was discovered located very far from Norse settlement w...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Secondly
..., this location is not great distance. secondly, the reading states that second problem...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 149, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: On
... evidence proves that the coin is fake. on the contrary, the professor contends th...
^^
Line 4, column 75, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the silver coins were useless for native American because these coins had wide us...
^^
Line 4, column 141, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...ins had wide use in Europe at the time. the speaker refutes this claims and states ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, finally, first, hence, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, in contrast, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 12.0772626932 149% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 22.412803532 147% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1544.0 1373.03311258 112% => OK
No of words: 309.0 270.72406181 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99676375405 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46840085812 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 145.348785872 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.47572815534 0.540411800872 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 481.5 419.366225166 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 21.2450331126 160% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 109.379845572 49.2860985944 222% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 171.555555556 110.228320801 156% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.3333333333 21.698381199 158% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.2222222222 7.06452816374 201% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.3 13.3589403974 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.97 53.8541721854 69% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.0289183223 151% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.7273730684 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.498013245 149% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.