Toward the end of his life, the Chevalier de Seingalt (1725−1798) wrote a long memoir recounting his
life and adventures. The Chevalier was a somewhat controversial figure, but since he met many famous
people, including kings and writers, his memoir has become a valuable historical source about European
society in the eighteenth century. However, some critics have raised doubts about the accuracy of the
memoir. They claim that the Chevalier distorted or invented many events in the memoir to make his life
seem more exciting and glamorous than it really was.
For example, in his memoir the Chevalier claims that while living in Switzerland, he was very wealthy, and
it is known that he spent a great deal of money there on parties and gambling. However, evidence has
recently surfaced that the Chevalier borrowed considerable sums of money from a Swiss merchant. Critics
thus argue that if the Chevalier had really been very rich, he would not have needed to borrow money.
Critics are also skeptical about the accuracy of the conversations that the Chevalier records in the memoir
between himself and the famous writer Voltaire. No one doubts that the Chevalier and Voltaire met and
conversed. However, critics complain that the memoir cannot possibly capture these conversations
accurately, because it was written many years after the conversations occurred. Critics point out that it is
impossible to remember exact phrases from extended conversations held many years earlier.
Critics have also questioned the memoir’s account of the Chevalier’s escape from a notorious prison in
Venice, Italy. He claims to have escaped the Venetian prison by using a piece of metal to make a hole
in the ceiling and climbing through the roof. Critics claim that while such a daring escape makes for
enjoyable reading, it is more likely that the Chevalier’s jailers were bribed to free him. They point out that
the Chevalier had a number of politically well-connected friends in Venice who could have offered a bribe.
he reading passage and the lecturer talking about Chevalier de Seingalt’s memories accuracy. However, some evidence have casted doubts about how exactly his memories were. They claim that the Chevalier faked numerous events in the memoir to make his life be more stunning and much better than how it really was.
The first allegation of the script against which the orator that Chevalier’s life was unworthy. The Critics who suggested that the fact, Chevalier barrow his money from one of the merchants, he was pretend that he had a lot of money. In contrast to the narrator which she insist that Chevalier was rich and he spent his money on holding parties and gambling as well. But in fact, she claimed that he run out the cash, so he was looking for some cash to barrow from the merchant because it takes time to convert his assets and getting cash instead.
The reading passage poses that there is cast doubt about another kind of diaries when Chevalier met a famous writer long time ago. However, it considers impossible that Chevalier still remember the details of a long conversation happened plethora of years ago. The aerator said that Chevalier had wrote his memories every night following that conversation. She also states that while writing the memoir the information from the written journal were used.
Lastly, another memories of Chevalier when he run away from a jail in Italy. Critics who’s claimed that Chevalier has numerous Italian Friends in politic department and they helped him to be free. The professor oppose this by stating that inside the jail there were a lot of powerful and stronger prisoners. Furthermore, they wouldn’t able to escape. Also, she assert that after Chevalier’s escaping, the government ordered to fix that ceiling. This validates the fact that he escaped through the ceiling as mentioned in the memoir.
Thus, the professor refutes all the controversies mentioned in the article and validates all the facts mentioned in the memoir, citing a possible reason.
- tpo 36 integrated writing 52
- building a new high school in your community 70
- TPO-39 3
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?•Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.•Wait until the class or meeting 73
- ome people trying to interrupt and correct the wrong issues immediately 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
he reading passage and the lecturer talkin...
^^
Line 1, column 4, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'reads'.
Suggestion: reads
he reading passage and the lecturer talking about ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 278, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'insists'.
Suggestion: insists
.... In contrast to the narrator which she insist that Chevalier was rich and he spent hi...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 297, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'written'.
Suggestion: written
...go. The aerator said that Chevalier had wrote his memories every night following that...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 216, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'opposes'.
Suggestion: opposes
...ey helped him to be free. The professor oppose this by stating that inside the jail th...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 371, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'asserts'.
Suggestion: asserts
...wouldn't able to escape. Also, she assert that after Chevalier's escaping, t...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, lastly, look, really, so, still, thus, well, while, in contrast, in fact, kind of, talking about, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 12.0772626932 182% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 22.412803532 192% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1701.0 1373.03311258 124% => OK
No of words: 334.0 270.72406181 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09281437126 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68474073931 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 145.348785872 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556886227545 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 419.366225166 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 3.25607064018 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.9105140129 49.2860985944 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.5 110.228320801 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5555555556 21.698381199 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.06452816374 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28471936048 0.272083759551 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0867335137609 0.0996497079465 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.050065467472 0.0662205650399 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150352816948 0.162205337803 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0578745317158 0.0443174109184 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 63.6247240618 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.