In the lecture, the professor show he disagrees with the points displayed in the passage for several reasons as below.
First, the professor argues that four-days working each week may not reduce the cost of company showed in the passage. on the contrary, it may rise the cost for companies have to hire more people. Meanwhile, more staffs need more official space and computers which will cut off company's profit.
Furthermore, the professor challenges that four-days working may not increase the employing rate. Instead recruiting more employees, companies may stress the present staffs to do the same volume work in four days to sustain the position.
Finally, the profess exhibits that four-days working may make people lose their competent and ability so that they may lose their job in the end although people can have more free time to arrange their own life.
- TPO-01 - Integrated Writing Task In the United States, employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day. However, many employees want to work a four-day week and are willing to accept less pay inorder to do so. A mandatory policy requiri 40
- TPO-03 - Integrated Writing Task Rembrandt is the most famous of the seventeenth-century Dutch painters. However, there are doubts whether some paintings attributed to Rembrandt were actually painted by him. One such painting is known as attributed to Rem 40
- TPO-01 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?At universities and colleges, sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support.Use specific reaso 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 119, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: On
... cost of company showed in the passage. on the contrary, it may rise the cost for ...
^^
Line 3, column 98, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Instead,
...ng may not increase the employing rate. Instead recruiting more employees, companies ma...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 10, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...days to sustain the position. Finally, the profess exhibits that four-days working may mak...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, if, may, so, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 0.0 10.4613686534 0% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 22.412803532 45% => OK
Preposition: 14.0 30.3222958057 46% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 727.0 1373.03311258 53% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 143.0 270.72406181 53% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08391608392 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.45807182446 4.04702891845 85% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4290610171 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 145.348785872 63% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.643356643357 0.540411800872 119% => OK
syllable_count: 215.1 419.366225166 51% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 13.0662251656 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5598575049 49.2860985944 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.857142857 110.228320801 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4285714286 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.14285714286 7.06452816374 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260059996246 0.272083759551 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127283525639 0.0996497079465 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0488287260758 0.0662205650399 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148607263809 0.162205337803 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0626301623165 0.0443174109184 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.3589403974 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 63.6247240618 58% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 40.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 12.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.