The reading passage states that working for four days a week could be better for different aspects. The lecturer casts many doubts about the statement for several reasons.
First, the author of the article reports that companies could save money, because they would pay less for salaries (80%) and for errors, given that employees being more rested and alert could make few errors in their work. However, the lecturer claims that companies could spend more money because they should hire more people in order to finish the tasks. Therefore, they should buy more offices or computers, for istance.
Second, the reading passage states that companies profits could increase because every employer cost less, giving the opportunity to hire others at the same salary. On the other hand, the author of the lecture disagrees, highlithing that hiring is expensive. Futhermore, he says that tough people work for less hours, companies expect the same result from them, so they could ask to employees for overtime in order to finish the work.
Finally, the article claims that working for four days a week instead for five, would be better for employees, improving their quality of life, for example, spending more free time with their families. The lecture gives a different point of view about free time, reporting that a more free time for workers could be dangerous, because they could look for other jobs.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 115, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...because they would pay less for salaries 80% and for errors, given that employee...
^^
Line 3, column 120, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...se they would pay less for salaries 80% and for errors, given that employees bei...
^^
Line 5, column 307, Rule ID: LESS_DOLLARSMINUTESHOURS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer hours'?
Suggestion: fewer hours
...ore, he says that tough people work for less hours, companies expect the same result from ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 307, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun hours is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ore, he says that tough people work for less hours, companies expect the same result...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, look, second, so, therefore, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 5.04856512141 238% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 17.0 30.3222958057 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1177.0 1373.03311258 86% => OK
No of words: 231.0 270.72406181 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09523809524 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.21326882068 2.5805825403 86% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549783549784 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 344.7 419.366225166 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.9457409226 49.2860985944 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.7 110.228320801 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1 21.698381199 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8 7.06452816374 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.452920038459 0.272083759551 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.179189740547 0.0996497079465 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.131667950301 0.0662205650399 199% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.282031020482 0.162205337803 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0591487832434 0.0443174109184 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 63.6247240618 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.