All the reading and the listening are about the results of having a group working on a project together.
First, according to the reading one of the advantages of working on a team is that having more members working together in same project provide them with more experince and knowledge. As a result the work will be finished quickly. However, the professor refutes this idea by explaining that the members of the team did not contribute together. He discusses that the work did not finished quickly because many meeting are needed to reach to an agreement between the all members of the team.
Second, the article claims that individuals of the group can be easily reconginzed and rewarded for the good work. On the other hand, the lecture opposes this notion by saying that no names, or individuales are recognized for the well done work. It is recognized for the all group without nomanting special person who is responible for the success.
Third, The passage avaers that group take the risky decision because there is no responsibilty for individual members of the group. Nevertheless, the lecturer rejectes this topic by stating that the blame is placed on all members of the group. according to the professor, some members may see that the project will go on other directions but they may be ignored by the other group member. And on the end the blame of the failure on work will be at everyone without exceptions for who tried to rescue the project.
Therefore, the professor questions all the ideas mentioned on the reading.
- TPO-47 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is important to know about events happening around the world, even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life. 60
- TPO-04 - Integrated Writing Task Endotherms are animals such as modern birds and mammals that keep their body temperatures constant. For instance, humans are endotherms and maintain an internal temperature of 37°C, no matter whether the environment is wa 86
- TPO-02 - Integrated Writing Task In many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team. Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages. First of all, a group of people 86
- TPO-02 - Integrated Writing Task In many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team. Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages. First of all, a group of people 35
- TPO-01 - Integrated Writing Task In the United States, employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day. However, many employees want to work a four-day week and are willing to accept less pay inorder to do so. A mandatory policy requiri 76
hello, can you please tell me
hello, can you please tell me where did you find the integrated writing exercice for practice ?
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 185, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...them with more experince and knowledge. As a result the work will be finished quic...
^^
Line 3, column 380, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'finish'
Suggestion: finish
...her. He discusses that the work did not finished quickly because many meeting are needed...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 244, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: According
... is placed on all members of the group. according to the professor, some members may see ...
^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'however', 'may', 'nevertheless', 'second', 'so', 'therefore', 'third', 'well', 'as a result', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.238596491228 0.261695866417 91% => OK
Verbs: 0.175438596491 0.158904122519 110% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0421052631579 0.0723426182421 58% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0385964912281 0.0435111971325 89% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0140350877193 0.0277247811725 51% => OK
Prepositions: 0.154385964912 0.128828473217 120% => OK
Participles: 0.080701754386 0.0370669169778 218% => Less participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.60735605534 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0175438596491 0.0208969081088 84% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.175438596491 0.128158765124 137% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0210526315789 0.0158828679856 133% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0105263157895 0.0114777025283 92% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1539.0 1645.83664459 94% => OK
No of words: 263.0 271.125827815 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.85171102662 6.08160592843 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.04852973271 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.357414448669 0.374372842146 95% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.292775665399 0.287516216867 102% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.163498098859 0.187439937562 87% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.114068441065 0.113142543107 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60735605534 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 145.348785872 93% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513307984791 0.539623497131 95% => OK
Word variations: 49.2921010868 53.8517498576 92% => OK
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0529801325 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.2307692308 21.7502111507 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.1726113811 49.3711431718 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.384615385 132.220823453 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2307692308 21.7502111507 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.923076923077 0.878197800319 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 3.39072847682 88% => OK
Readability: 49.5083357707 50.5018328374 98% => OK
Elegance: 2.07692307692 1.90840788429 109% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.591396158659 0.549887131256 108% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.182197056779 0.142949733639 127% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0931574573282 0.0787303798458 118% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.721384245527 0.631733273073 114% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.148002525076 0.139662658121 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.308971805538 0.266732575781 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0722433512587 0.103435571967 70% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.487595734742 0.414875509568 118% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0752385854153 0.0530846634433 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.395192782389 0.40443939384 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113052127066 0.0528353158467 214% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.26048565121 94% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 3.49668874172 143% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.62251655629 110% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 3.1766004415 126% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 10.2958057395 126% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.