The lecturer claims that team works, which a group of people take part in a group. It has some disadvantage, which explains in three reason. This doesnot agree with the reading passage, which suggest that such a team work would be beneficial.
First, the reading states that participate in a group, has worthwhile to contribute with other people. It has a competitive atomsphere. However the lecturer explains that it won`t have the desired effect as described by author and refutes each of the points provided by the author.
Second, the article declares that the team work combine the idea together. It has a crucial rule in a innovative project. the reason is that single individual explore a suggestion. A controverisal discussion begins at the point that researcher said that a consensus of opinion between particular member of group is inappropriate.
Third, the reading posits that each fellow can take responsibility of piece of plan. But, this doesnot agree with the lecturer ideology.
- TPO-01 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?At universities and colleges, sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support.Use specific reaso 40
- TPO-03 - Integrated Writing Task Rembrandt is the most famous of the seventeenth-century Dutch painters. However, there are doubts whether some paintings attributed to Rembrandt were actually painted by him. One such painting is known as attributed to Rem 40
- TPO-04 - Integrated Writing Task Endotherms are animals such as modern birds and mammals that keep their body temperatures constant. For instance, humans are endotherms and maintain an internal temperature of 37°C, no matter whether the environment is wa 63
- TPO-02 - Integrated Writing Task In many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team. Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages. First of all, a group of people 54
- TPO-11 - Independent Writing Task Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with?Use specific reasons and examples to support you 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 137, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...eople. It has a competitive atomsphere. However the lecturer explains that it won'...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 101, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...idea together. It has a crucial rule in a innovative project. the reason is that ...
^
Line 5, column 123, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...a crucial rule in a innovative project. the reason is that single individual explor...
^^^
Line 5, column 257, Rule ID: CONSENSUS_OF_OPINION[1]
Message: Use simply 'consensus'.
Suggestion: consensus
...t the point that researcher said that a consensus of opinion between particular member of group is i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, second, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.4613686534 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 7.30242825607 14% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 30.3222958057 63% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 847.0 1373.03311258 62% => OK
No of words: 162.0 270.72406181 60% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22839506173 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 4.04702891845 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91138884946 2.5805825403 113% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 145.348785872 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.604938271605 0.540411800872 112% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 419.366225166 61% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 21.2450331126 61% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.2478926591 49.2860985944 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 70.5833333333 110.228320801 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.5 21.698381199 62% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 7.06452816374 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222814557858 0.272083759551 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0680926255229 0.0996497079465 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0595428437663 0.0662205650399 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116531132554 0.162205337803 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0512946355288 0.0443174109184 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.3589403974 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 53.8541721854 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 12.46 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 63.6247240618 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.498013245 69% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.