The reading and the passage are both about the efficiency of working as a group. The author of the reading states that woking in group is more likely to get the work done faster and also encourage the individuals to contribute more to the project. The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made by the author. She belives that group working is not as efficient as mentioned in the reading.
First off all, the reading says that the more members participating in the group, the faster the work will be done. He believes that the diversity of knowlegde and expertise of each person in the group will yield better solutions to enhance to work speed. This point is challenged by the lecturer. She thinks that the variety of ideas presented in the group will hamper the process of reaching to conclusion. Futhermore, she conclude with fact that working group take more time to finalize their ideas and delayed the workflow.
Secondly, the author claims that the individual working in group is more easy to express his or her opinion, and more likely to shined or acknowlegded once their ideas were accepted. He suggests that with the help of the group, eventhough the ideas of how to proceed sound risky, is much easier to get approved. The lecturer casts doubt on the point made by the author. She is the opinion that this is much more harder for the individual in the group to get acknowlegde and approved. Under the infullence of other high-rank member, the idea presented by that person could be ignored or rejected. Even if the idea was approved, the credit will goes to all the member of the team, but not the one who comes up with it.
- TPO-05 - Integrated Writing Task As early as the twelfth century A.D., the settlements of Chaco Canyon in New Mexico in the American Southwest were notable for their "great houses," massive stone buildings that contain hundreds of rooms and often stand th 75
- TPO-08 - Integrated Writing Task Toward the end of his life, the Chevalier de Seingalt (1725-1798) wrote a long memoir recounting his life and adventures. The Chevalier was a somewhat controversial figure, but since he met many famous people, including ki 78
- It is argue that getting married before finishing school or getting a job is not a good choice. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- As a result of advances in medical care, average life expectancy is increasing for men and women. Do you think most people will see this as a positive development? What are the disadvantages of an ageing population for individuals and society? Support you 27
- TPO-07 - Integrated Writing Task In an effort to encourage ecologically sustainable forestry practices, an international organization started issuing certifications to wood companies that meet high ecological standards by conserving resources and recyclin 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 249, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...uals to contribute more to the project. The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made...
^^^
Line 3, column 426, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'concludes'.
Suggestion: concludes
...reaching to conclusion. Futhermore, she conclude with fact that working group take more ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 408, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'harder' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: harder
...r. She is the opinion that this is much more harder for the individual in the group to get ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 644, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'go'
Suggestion: go
... the idea was approved, the credit will goes to all the member of the team, but not ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 30.3222958057 142% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1349.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 291.0 270.72406181 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63573883162 5.08290768461 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42505550026 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 145.348785872 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.484536082474 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 413.1 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0757140445 49.2860985944 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.9333333333 110.228320801 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4 21.698381199 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.8 7.06452816374 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319304640584 0.272083759551 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108591773436 0.0996497079465 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0618455244464 0.0662205650399 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226571980515 0.162205337803 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0159219685192 0.0443174109184 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.3589403974 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 53.8541721854 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.0289183223 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 12.2367328918 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.