The passage and lecture talk about the effect leaded by taking members into groups in company. The author think it is benefit because the whole knowledge is much more than individuals as well as the group have creative ideas and can make risky decision because of the average less responsibility on each one, and the rewarding achieved by the individuals. However, the professor indicates that the groups cannot make efficacious agreement and personal attitude towards the contribution also differ with what the passage said.
To begin with, rather than think the contribution is rewarding and shining, both the one who works hard and one who works lothly consider the contrary. For the loth individuals, because the rewarding is as same as those working-hard one in the whole group, they have less motivation to try their best. For these making great contribution to the group, they are certainly unpleasant to their conditions.
What's worse, the group also cannot make an efficient agreement. Consider their meetings. Every meeting would cost a long time to reach make a consensus. Some individuals maybe reject to a project, while the other maybe support. Some may think one decision is creative, but a few may find their deficiency and risks. However, in some times, the later voice may be covered up by the former one, but the blame in the end will impose on all the members. It's not fair to those provident employees.
- TPO-34 - Integrated Writing Task A huge marine mammal known as Steller’s sea cow once lived in the waters around Bering Island off the coast of Siberia. It was described in 1741 by Georg W. Steller, a naturalist who was among the first Europeans to see 3
- TPO-07 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is more important for students to understand ideas and concepts than it is for them to learn facts.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO-08 - Integrated Writing Task Toward the end of his life, the Chevalier de Seingalt (1725-1798) wrote a long memoir recounting his life and adventures. The Chevalier was a somewhat controversial figure, but since he met many famous people, including ki 80
- TPO-07 - Integrated Writing Task In an effort to encourage ecologically sustainable forestry practices, an international organization started issuing certifications to wood companies that meet high ecological standards by conserving resources and recyclin 80
- TPO-01 - Integrated Writing Task In the United States, employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day. However, many employees want to work a four-day week and are willing to accept less pay inorder to do so. A mandatory policy requiri 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 142, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rd and one who works lothly consider the contrary. For the loth individuals, beca...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...nly unpleasant to their conditions. Whats worse, the group also cannot make an ef...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 142, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g would cost a long time to reach make a consensus. Some individuals maybe reject...
^^
Line 5, column 239, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'thinks'.
Suggestion: thinks
...while the other maybe support. Some may think one decision is creative, but a few may...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 277, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[6]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun may seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'little may'.
Suggestion: little may
...y think one decision is creative, but a few may find their deficiency and risks. Howeve...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, well, while, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 12.0772626932 25% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 22.412803532 54% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1194.0 1373.03311258 87% => OK
No of words: 238.0 270.72406181 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01680672269 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64721888272 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596638655462 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 373.5 419.366225166 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 60.9496833899 49.2860985944 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.8461538462 110.228320801 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3076923077 21.698381199 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.46153846154 7.06452816374 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30930102027 0.272083759551 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0941782233763 0.0996497079465 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0781073957549 0.0662205650399 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206455564974 0.162205337803 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0813557562439 0.0443174109184 184% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.7273730684 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.