The lecturer disagrees with every point that the author made in the reading passage regarding how teamwork can be good for the company by bringing in following examples.
First of all, the lecturer disapproves the advantages of putting people in teams by stating that individual can work or make a decision faster than teams. The author from the reading passage claims that teams can work more quickly than individual hence they have more expertise and manpower. However, the lecturer states that team is way slower than an individual due to many differing opinions that people have when it comes to making a decision in the company. In order for a team to move forward with a decision, every member has to reach an agreement on the decision with other members. Whereas, the individual will not take any permission or opinion and will proceed with his or her ideas.
Secondly, the lecturer refutes the idea of a person getting recognition from his or her peers when the project becomes successful. The author thinks that members of the team who come up with creative solutions will be respected among his or her peers. However, the lecturer states that the team will get recognition when the project becomes a hit. The opposite effect would also be true which is that the all the team members will share the responsibility when the projects fail.
Finally, according to the lecturer, not being able to finish work faster and not being able to get recognition for those who contributed are the two reasons why that team is a good solution for a company.
- TPO-01 - Integrated Writing Task In the United States, employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day. However, many employees want to work a four-day week and are willing to accept less pay inorder to do so. A mandatory policy requiri 76
- TPO-02 - Integrated Writing Task In many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team. Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages. First of all, a group of people 81
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, hence, however, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, whereas, as to, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1294.0 1373.03311258 94% => OK
No of words: 267.0 270.72406181 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84644194757 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51279322859 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513108614232 0.540411800872 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 400.5 419.366225166 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.4405666697 49.2860985944 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.636363636 110.228320801 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2727272727 21.698381199 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.81818181818 7.06452816374 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 4.45695364238 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.401965064595 0.272083759551 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.158069736099 0.0996497079465 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0729980047358 0.0662205650399 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209344707801 0.162205337803 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116514703324 0.0443174109184 263% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.3589403974 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 63.6247240618 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.