Both the passage and the lecture explain about the group working. The author of the passage believes that team working is better than the working individually, however, the professor in the lecture casts doubt on the reading and refutes the author's reasons by providing the evidence of a company.
At first, the passage states that the result of the team working will be better than the working alone. Because in each group, every member has special skills, knowledge, and experiences, hence, the result of the team working will be better than working individually. On the other hand, the professor in the lecture challenges this assertion and states that in that research, some members of a group did not work very well, but, they benefited the result.
Second, the passage believes that team working is quicker than working alone. However, the professor explains that in the mentioned research, members waste a lot of time for discussing the group decisions. Hence, the whole project progressed slowly.
Finally, the author acclaims that in team working, each member has this opportunity to shine. However, the professor opposes this assertion and explains that the impressive people in the group choose especial decisions. Although other members know that these decisions are not correct, they cannot oppose their superior, hence, the project will fail and all of the members will be affected by this failure.
- TPO-03 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
- TPO 39 integrated writing 52
- TPO-44 - Integrated Writing Task In 1957 a European silver coin dating to the eleventh century was discovered at a Native American archaeological site in the state of Maine in the United States. Many people believed the coin had been originally brought to 68
- TPO 6 integrated essay 7
- Do you agree or disagree "we should pay attention to the opinions of famous people"? 65
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 354, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...erior, hence, the project will fail and all of the members will be affected by this failur...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, hence, however, second, so, well, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 30.3222958057 69% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1190.0 1373.03311258 87% => OK
No of words: 228.0 270.72406181 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21929824561 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48527519558 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 145.348785872 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.478070175439 0.540411800872 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 352.8 419.366225166 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.6953044892 49.2860985944 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.181818182 110.228320801 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7272727273 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.54545454545 7.06452816374 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.322075826711 0.272083759551 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131805641305 0.0996497079465 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0678727959564 0.0662205650399 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201698931428 0.162205337803 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0597115520119 0.0443174109184 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.3589403974 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.