The lecturer disputes some reasons presented in the reading on the advantages of teamwork in many organizations.
According to the reading, team work involves greater number of people with more resources than an individual which will lead to a faster response in accomplishing assigned tasks with more creative ideas to problems. Furthermore, responsibilities are spread across members of the group and no individual is held accountable if a project goes wrong. However, the lecturer casts doubt on this by stating that it is a nightmare to reach a consensus on making appropriate decisions among team members. He restates that it takes many more meetings for a team to come up with an agreement on particular task due to the differing opinions among the group. Moreover, when one or two people becomes very influential in the group, they impose their ideas on the group without considering the opinions of the other members. In a case when a project fails due to the poor decision of some influential members of the team, the blame goes to all the members not on the individual.
Second, the reading states that team work can be gratifying. Team members who makes significant contribution to the success of a task can be recognized. On the contrary, the lecturer refutes this by stating that some members of the team can be nonchalant and make no meaningful contribution to the success of tasks and gets applause from the work of other diligent members because the rating of success goes to all members of the group and not an individual. This tends to discourage the attitude of the hardworking members of the team.
In conclusion,the lecturer clarifies on the various disadvantages of teamwork in many organizations
- TPO-28 - Integrated Writing Task Robert E. Peary was a well-known adventurer and arctic explorer who in 1909 set out to reach the North Pole. When he returned from the expedition, he claimed to have reached the pole on April 7, 1909. This report made him 85
- TPO-49 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends 76
- TPO-47 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is important to know about events happening around the world, even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life. 96
- TPO-17 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Most advertisements make products seem much better then they really are.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO-49 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 23, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
The lecturer disputes some of the reasons presented in the reading on the...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 240, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'spreads'' or 'spread's'?
Suggestion: spreads'; spread's
...eas to problems. Furthermore, the group spreads responsibility across members of the gr...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 14, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ng members of the team. In conclusion , the lecturer clarifies on the various d...
^^
Line 7, column 102, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ntages of teamwork in many organizations
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, so, as to, in conclusion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 22.412803532 54% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 30.3222958057 181% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1455.0 1373.03311258 106% => OK
No of words: 290.0 270.72406181 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01724137931 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96086749786 2.5805825403 115% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493103448276 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 444.6 419.366225166 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.468933783 49.2860985944 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.25 110.228320801 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1666666667 21.698381199 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06452816374 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.467839819753 0.272083759551 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.162882411204 0.0996497079465 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0856640463409 0.0662205650399 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191906424884 0.162205337803 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.181193427102 0.0443174109184 409% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.3589403974 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 63.6247240618 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.7273730684 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.