The author mentions that a painting portraying a woman face was not the work of famous Dutch painter, Rembrandt, because of three reasons. However, the professor disagrees with that notion, believing that the painting was in fact the work of Rembrandt.
First of all, the fur collar which brings inconsistency with the style of Rembrandt was added later on from the original painting. The researchers have found out that the original portrait was actually wearing a white collar and later on other painters add the fur collar because they thought it would probably raise the value of the painting.
Secondly, the original portrait was considered the fitting of light and shadow professionally. Since the woman, who was portrayed, was wearing the white collar, the light actually will reflect and the face should be illuminated by it. The style which is in accordance with Rembrandt’s one. Therefore, what author mentions about representing of shadow face because of dark fur collar is not correct as the woman in the original painting was wearing white collar rather than wearing dark collar.
Finally, author states that the portrait was painted on several pieces of wood panels and this is in contrast with the Rembrandt’s style. Nevertheless, professor debunks this reason and says that the original portrait was painted on the single piece of wood panel and the other pieces were added afterwards in order to make the painting more valuable and to enlarge it. Interestingly, the woman portrait was painted on the same wood panel which Rembrandt was used to self portrait with wearing a hat.
All of these reasons mentioned above, was discovered by scientists later on which proof that the woman portrait was originally the work of Rembrandt. However, some other painters add fur collar and some wood panels to make it more valuable whereas practically they reduce its value.
- TPO-02 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- TPO-02 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- tpo 8.Television advertising directed towards young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed. 90
- TPO-02 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- TPO-01 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?At universities and colleges, sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support.Use specific reaso 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, finally, first, however, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, whereas, in contrast, in fact, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.4613686534 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 30.3222958057 132% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1597.0 1373.03311258 116% => OK
No of words: 308.0 270.72406181 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18506493506 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71990927728 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.454545454545 0.540411800872 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 471.6 419.366225166 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.116997792494 1709% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5614546941 49.2860985944 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.846153846 110.228320801 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6923076923 21.698381199 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.61538461538 7.06452816374 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.482690895378 0.272083759551 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.207304393491 0.0996497079465 208% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0791755815033 0.0662205650399 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.292861874216 0.162205337803 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0922214632408 0.0443174109184 208% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.3589403974 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.