One of the paintings attributed to Rembrandt, a Dutch painter, is conceived not to be his original work. In other words, it seems that the portrait is not painted by Rembrandt for three reasons explained in the passage which are explained as follows:
The first reason is that the woman in the painting has dressed in an inconsistent manner. She has worn a white linen cap with a fur collar. While the former is a kind of dressed only worn by servants, the latter is a luxurious one that no servant could afford to wear. However, according to the lecture, the fur collar is not part of the woman’s dress in the original painting and it is added to the painting hundred years after the original painting has been painted.
The second reason is that there is an inconsistency in how the light and shadow are painted. The face of the woman is illuminated by the light reflected from her fur collar, while her collar is black and absorbs the light rather than reflecting light. on the contrary, the lecturer states that the collar has a light color in the original painting which reflects the light.
The third reason is that the painting is painted on a panel consists of several pieces of wood glued together, which is not a common panel used in Rembrandt’s paintings. According to the lecture, the original painting is painted on a single piece of wood made up of a tree used for another painting by Rembrandt.
To conclude, the reading explains three reasons to show that the painting is not Rembrandt’s work. However, the lecture challenges the points made in the passage by clarifying the features of Rembrandt’s original work.
- TPO-24 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?One of the best ways that parents can help their teenage children prepare for adult life is to encourage them to take a part-time job.Use specific reasons and examples 73
- TPO-25 - Integrated Writing Task In 1938 an archaeologist in Iraq acquired a set of clay jars that had been excavated two years earlier by villagers constructing a railroad line. The vessel was about 2,200 years old. Each clay jay contained a copper cylin 80
- TPO-49 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends 73
- TPO-25 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 65
- TPO-22 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 64, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an inconsistent manner" with adverb for "inconsistent"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...t the woman in the painting has dressed in an inconsistent manner. She has worn a white linen cap with a ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 406, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a hundred'.
Suggestion: a hundred
...ainting and it is added to the painting hundred years after the original painting has b...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, third, while, kind of, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 10.4613686534 191% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 22.412803532 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1353.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 282.0 270.72406181 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79787234043 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80774265952 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 145.348785872 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.45390070922 0.540411800872 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 403.2 419.366225166 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.4696353974 49.2860985944 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.75 110.228320801 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 21.698381199 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 7.06452816374 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.521386421704 0.272083759551 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.205771709417 0.0996497079465 206% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0943464327403 0.0662205650399 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.293705846285 0.162205337803 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.08403670119 0.0443174109184 190% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 53.8541721854 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 12.2367328918 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.42419426049 90% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 63.6247240618 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.