The professor illustrates three points against the three points in the passage about taking dinosaurs into account as endothermic species. She said we could bot conclude that living in polar region is a strong evidence for supposing dinosaurs as endothermic animal, second having leg beneath the body in not an indicator of high energy body , and the last point she added was about fluctuations in grows of dinosaurs which will help not to consider them as endothermic.
First, She pointed out that living in polar region is not a strong reason for taking a species into account as endothermic, since nowadays that the polar regions are warmer that before, we have not got so many endothermic species there and even it was correct that, they had been living there , they could not immigrate or hibernate in a very cold weathers.
Second, she added the idea behind having legs and limbs underneath the body would lead to this, we conclude that they were high energy animals would be thrown away and it doesn't meet all of requirement for having such a result. But considering these legs for carrying large body size is a logical conclusions.
At last, she pointed out that evidences like faster growing and the slower growing will throw away considering dinosaurs as endothermic species. Because based on some evidences dinosaurs had not got steady growth rate, so the species with this characteristic could not be taken as endothermic.
- People's behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In d 66
- TPO-01 - Integrated Writing Task In the United States, employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day. However, many employees want to work a four-day week and are willing to accept less pay inorder to do so. A mandatory policy requiri 76
- TPO-07 - Integrated Writing Task In an effort to encourage ecologically sustainable forestry practices, an international organization started issuing certifications to wood companies that meet high ecological standards by conserving resources and recyclin 78
- TPO-02 - Integrated Writing Task In many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team. Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages. First of all, a group of people 60
- TPO-05 - Integrated Writing Task As early as the twelfth century A.D., the settlements of Chaco Canyon in New Mexico in the American Southwest were notable for their "great houses," massive stone buildings that contain hundreds of rooms and often stand th 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 341, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... in not an indicator of high energy body , and the last point she added was about ...
^^
Line 3, column 293, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...correct that, they had been living there , they could not immigrate or hibernate i...
^^
Line 3, column 349, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'weather'?
Suggestion: weather
...t immigrate or hibernate in a very cold weathers. Second, she added the idea behind ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 172, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...rgy animals would be thrown away and it doesnt meet all of requirement for having such...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 298, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'conclusion'?
Suggestion: conclusion
...r carrying large body size is a logical conclusions. At last, she pointed out that evide...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1202.0 1373.03311258 88% => OK
No of words: 240.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00833333333 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62878778857 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566666666667 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 367.2 419.366225166 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 8.23620309051 12% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 13.0662251656 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 21.2450331126 160% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 97.1256287244 49.2860985944 197% => OK
Chars per sentence: 171.714285714 110.228320801 156% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.2857142857 21.698381199 158% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.14285714286 7.06452816374 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271514536893 0.272083759551 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126569073027 0.0996497079465 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0409119841976 0.0662205650399 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162925598983 0.162205337803 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0369025132604 0.0443174109184 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.3 13.3589403974 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.43 53.8541721854 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.0289183223 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.37 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 63.6247240618 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 10.7273730684 177% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.498013245 149% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.2008830022 170% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.