The reading states that Chaco Canyon the "great house" was massive and contained large space and were three or four stories high and the archaeologists are determining how the buildings are used by providing three reasons of support. In contrast, the professor states refute all the three reasons of support given by the reading passage about the usage of Chaco building.
First of all, the reading states that Chaco was used to house hundreds of people and resembles apartment building at Taos, Mexico where many people have been living for centuries. However, the professor refutes by stating that only a few people lived inside the Chaco building. He further states that fireplaces would be used by families staying inside the building and only a few of them were found. As a result, few families lived inside the great building.
Second, the reading mentions that Chaco building was used for storing food like grain maize which was the major food consumed by the people living in Chaco. Nevertheless, the professor opposes this point by stating that excavation of that place resulted in failure for finding any traces of grain maize or grain containers.
Finally, the reading purports that building was used for a ceremonial purpose. Food was prepared in pots and was thrown away in the building. However, the professor says that other materials which are not used in ceremonial function were also found like sand, building tools. He also mentions that pots that were found during excavation might have been used by the workers.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, nevertheless, second, so, in contrast, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1298.0 1373.03311258 95% => OK
No of words: 254.0 270.72406181 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11023622047 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46150850457 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.488188976378 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 391.5 419.366225166 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.5336998693 49.2860985944 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.166666667 110.228320801 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1666666667 21.698381199 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.91666666667 7.06452816374 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.337053254049 0.272083759551 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12978571822 0.0996497079465 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.085603735894 0.0662205650399 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208561581463 0.162205337803 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0209155568999 0.0443174109184 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.3589403974 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.