Reading and lecture have contradictory in term of reliability of online encyclopedias. Although reading expresses three reasons to refute validity of these information sources but professor disagrees and give her reasons to provide acceptable hints in order to admire credibility online encyclopedias.
First, reading states that people who write these communal online encyclopedias haven't enough knowledge on that specific topic because of shortage of experts so they almost make so many errors. In the lecture professor says traditional printed books also contain errors the difference is that online form can be corrected easily.
Second, author claims that communal online encyclopedias may be attack by hackers and other malicious person that can falsify original text. Professor expresses two strategies to avoid falsification of communal online encyclopedias, first giving read only format of them and second hiring some editors to monitoring and correcting the corrupted part of text.
Finally, reading says communal online encyclopedias focused on a topic and cause false and complex impression on readers, on the other hand reading claims that most of communal online form topics are trivial and less academic. However, professor refutes this and says against printed form craters which always encountered a shortage of space and enforced to select more important topics, online communal encyclopedias have enough space to present diversity topics and meet different people need.
- TPO-03 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- TPO-05 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment-doing things they like to do-rather than doing things they should do.Use specific reasons and examples to suppo 65
- TPO-08 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Television advertising directed towards young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- TPO-06 - Integrated Writing Task Communal online encyclopedias represent one of the latest resources to be found on the Internet. They are in many respects like traditional printed encyclopedias collections of articles on various subjects. What is specifi 80
- TPO-10 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 224, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...fessor disagrees and give her reasons to provide acceptable hints in order to adm...
^^
Line 2, column 81, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: haven't
...ite these communal online encyclopedias havent enough knowledge on that specific topic...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 343, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...me editors to monitoring and correcting the The corrupted part of text. Finally, rea...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 343, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'The' is left.
Suggestion: the; The
...me editors to monitoring and correcting the The corrupted part of text. Finally, rea...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 346, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...editors to monitoring and correcting the The corrupted part of text. Finally, ...
^^^
Line 4, column 29, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cting the The corrupted part of text. Finally, reading says communal online en...
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'finally', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'second', 'so', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.305084745763 0.261695866417 117% => OK
Verbs: 0.173728813559 0.158904122519 109% => OK
Adjectives: 0.127118644068 0.0723426182421 176% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0508474576271 0.0435111971325 117% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0169491525424 0.0277247811725 61% => OK
Prepositions: 0.110169491525 0.128828473217 86% => OK
Participles: 0.0635593220339 0.0370669169778 171% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.83669791662 2.5805825403 110% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0296610169492 0.0208969081088 142% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0508474576271 0.128158765124 40% => Some determiners wanted.
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0127118644068 0.0158828679856 80% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0127118644068 0.0114777025283 111% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1506.0 1645.83664459 92% => OK
No of words: 224.0 271.125827815 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.72321428571 6.08160592843 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 4.04852973271 96% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.504464285714 0.374372842146 135% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.357142857143 0.287516216867 124% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.227678571429 0.187439937562 121% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.15625 0.113142543107 138% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83669791662 2.5805825403 110% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 145.348785872 92% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598214285714 0.539623497131 111% => OK
Word variations: 59.6628932694 53.8517498576 111% => OK
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0529801325 61% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 21.7502111507 129% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.5794518796 49.3711431718 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 188.25 132.220823453 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 21.7502111507 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.25 0.878197800319 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 3.39072847682 177% => OK
Readability: 63.7142857143 50.5018328374 126% => OK
Elegance: 1.98245614035 1.90840788429 104% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3198534974 0.549887131256 58% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.136012628887 0.142949733639 95% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0442377727343 0.0787303798458 56% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.733339949174 0.631733273073 116% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.132674910811 0.139662658121 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.166689103806 0.266732575781 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0468198826613 0.103435571967 45% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.146267069388 0.414875509568 35% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0554371758452 0.0530846634433 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200249183911 0.40443939384 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0327111199253 0.0528353158467 62% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.26048565121 47% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 3.49668874172 86% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.62251655629 83% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 3.1766004415 63% => OK
Total topic words: 8.0 10.2958057395 78% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.