TPO-09 - Integrated Writing Task Car manufacturers and governments have been eagerly seeking a replacement for the automobile's main source of power, the internal-combustion engine. By far the most promising alternative source of energy for cars is the hy

The reading and the lecture are both about hydrogen-based-fuel-cell, which uses hydrogen to operate cars. While the article mentions the advantages of fuel-cell engines over current engines, the lecturer casts doubt on all those advantages by saying that the passage failed in the assessment of fuel-cell engines.

First of all, the article states that internal-combustion engine depends on petroleum, which is nonrenewable source of energy; in contrast, the fuel-cell engine cannot be easily depleted because it comes from oil or even water. The professor, on the other hand, explains that hydrogen fuel in not easily to be produced. She argues that the process is highly artificial to obtain pure liquid, then very cold temperature more than minus two hundred are applied to get it, thus, it is not such practical way.

Second, the author claims that the hydrogen- based fuel cell does not produce carbon dioxide as a byproduct, therefore, does not hurt environment. The professor, conversely, discusses that hydrogen-based fuel cell does not solve pollution problem. She elaborates on this by mentioning that a lot of pollution is created by purification process to produce hydrogen fuel, where it depends on burning oil or coal to obtain energy, and if the cars did not pollute, the factories would pollute the environment.

Third, and last disadvantages that mentioned by the author is that fuel-cell engine will be more economic than current engine because it will be twice as efficient as current engine in using the fuel. Conversely, the speaker illustrates that there will not be any money saving. She puts forth the idea that hydrogen-cell engine does not undergo any chemical reaction without platinum, which is very expensive material. Moreover, the process of replacing platinum with any cheaper material was completely unsuccessful.

Votes
Average: 8.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, if, moreover, second, so, then, therefore, third, thus, while, in contrast, first of all, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1567.0 1373.03311258 114% => OK
No of words: 291.0 270.72406181 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38487972509 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09138952931 2.5805825403 120% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 145.348785872 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580756013746 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 419.366225166 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.1439783832 49.2860985944 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.583333333 110.228320801 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 21.698381199 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5 7.06452816374 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.51941048624 0.272083759551 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.192586511672 0.0996497079465 193% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118202809174 0.0662205650399 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.312805218488 0.162205337803 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0175794749681 0.0443174109184 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.3589403974 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.8541721854 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.0289183223 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.2367328918 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.42419426049 113% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 63.6247240618 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.