tpo 11.
The main idea of both the passage and the talk is about a whether a portrait is owned to Austen or not. Considering this, the reading claims that the girl in the portrait is Austen for three reasons; the professor, on the other hand, not only reputes the author's assessments, but also asserts that the announced option runs counter to the way the reading just argued. The lecture demonstrates three reasons to reject the points in the reading.
The first criticism of the passage against which the lecture argues is that due to illustration of Austen's portraits in one her editions letter, the Austen' family believe that the portraits is owned by Austen . As stated by the professor, when Austen's family offered his portrait in one her letters’ publication, Austen was dead for about 17 years old.
Moreover, unlike the reading which claims that there is a similarity between the face of in the portrait and that of in Cassandra's sketch. The professor illustrates that it is possible that Cassandra's relatives were the subject of sketch due to the fact that on that time there were female teenagers or children of them who were resemble to Austen.
Finally, the lecture contradicts the fallacy of the reading that the portrait has been made when Austen was a teenager, saying that back of the canvas there is something that was sold by a man, whose name alludes me at this time, which indicates that the material was used when Austen was older rather than being a teenager.
All in all, the professor maintains that evidence presenting in the passage regarding the portrait is not convincing.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 221, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ve that the portraits is owned by Austen . As stated by the professor, when Austen...
^^
Line 3, column 341, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'resembled'.
Suggestion: resembled
... teenagers or children of them who were resemble to Austen. Finally, the lecture contra...
^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'finally', 'first', 'moreover', 'regarding', 'so', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.257053291536 0.261695866417 98% => OK
Verbs: 0.141065830721 0.158904122519 89% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0470219435737 0.0723426182421 65% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0313479623824 0.0435111971325 72% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0188087774295 0.0277247811725 68% => OK
Prepositions: 0.144200626959 0.128828473217 112% => OK
Participles: 0.0376175548589 0.0370669169778 101% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.85791592146 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0188087774295 0.0208969081088 90% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.150470219436 0.128158765124 117% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.0158828679856 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0282131661442 0.0114777025283 246% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1630.0 1645.83664459 99% => OK
No of words: 274.0 271.125827815 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.94890510949 6.08160592843 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.04852973271 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.350364963504 0.374372842146 94% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.273722627737 0.287516216867 95% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.178832116788 0.187439937562 95% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.124087591241 0.113142543107 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85791592146 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521897810219 0.539623497131 97% => OK
Word variations: 51.2067957031 53.8517498576 95% => OK
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0529801325 69% => OK
Sentence length: 30.4444444444 21.7502111507 140% => OK
Sentence length SD: 78.0495252712 49.3711431718 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 181.111111111 132.220823453 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.4444444444 21.7502111507 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.888888888889 0.878197800319 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.39072847682 59% => OK
Readability: 57.8167072182 50.5018328374 114% => OK
Elegance: 2.29508196721 1.90840788429 120% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.494499637693 0.451937469235 109% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.243202891232 0.142949733639 170% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.08842383292 0.0787303798458 112% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.838220978421 0.631733273073 133% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.117955832655 0.139662658121 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.311299734268 0.21790590567 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0870384968811 0.0871468918476 100% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.408747832809 0.414875509568 99% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0855905813884 0.0530846634433 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.352147142141 0.332364718235 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0787530407036 0.0446026805963 177% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 4.33554083885 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.26048565121 70% => OK
Positive topic words: 0.0 3.49668874172 0% => More positive topic words wanted.
Negative topic words: 6.0 3.62251655629 166% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 3.1766004415 94% => OK
Total topic words: 9.0 10.2958057395 87% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations to cover all aspects.