TPO 11 the decline in reading literature
The material discusses the effect of the decline of literature readers. While the reading claims that this trend has a detrimental effect on the reading public, culture, and the future of literature, the listening challenges all the points outlined in the reading passage.
First, the author states that literature has the most influential factor on people's intellectual capacity, which enhances their language and imagination. On the other hand, the professor opposes this and points out that books do not have to be literature to provide the intellectual stimulation. The lecturer explains that other types of books, such as history, political analysis, and science have good quality. The speaker says that these books can enhance readers' imagination, given that they are as creative and well-written as literature books.
Second, the writer mentions that decline in the literature reading could lower the level of culture in general. The professor encounters this and cites that if people do not read books in general, it does not mean that the culture is in decline. The lecture says that when people spend their time listen to a quality music or watch a good movie, they do not waste their time. According to the lecture, culture has changed today, it could speak more directely, and there are other forms that can represent it rather than novels.
Third, the reading posits that the poor standards of today's readers inhibit publishers to invest in literature, so literature will decline. Conversely, the professor contradicts this and contends that if literature does not have lots of audience, it is not the responsibility of readers, but it is the authors' fault. The lecture brings up that literature tend to be very difficult, so readers could not understand it. The speaker adds early readers can not read today's literature either.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-19 | Christine hanna | 80 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 230, Rule ID: LOTS_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun audience seems to be countable; consider using: 'lots of audiences'.
Suggestion: lots of audiences
...ntends that if literature does not have lots of audience, it is not the responsibility of reader...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 489, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... can not read todays literature either.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, first, if, second, so, third, well, while, in general, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1550.0 1373.03311258 113% => OK
No of words: 298.0 270.72406181 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20134228188 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7221881078 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523489932886 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 419.366225166 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 13.0 8.23620309051 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.7349291941 49.2860985944 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.714285714 110.228320801 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2857142857 21.698381199 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06452816374 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.41836883068 0.272083759551 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148784206411 0.0996497079465 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0854741245108 0.0662205650399 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.264230570958 0.162205337803 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0681072864736 0.0443174109184 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 63.6247240618 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.7273730684 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.